1993
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9601(93)90997-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Friedel oscillations for temperatures T≠0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7b and in Eqs. (55) and (56) are extensions of the predictions of Refs. [9,12] concerning 2D electron gas in materials with honeycomb lattice.…”
Section: Fig 3 A) Position Of the Fermi Level For Ws2 In A Magneticsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7b and in Eqs. (55) and (56) are extensions of the predictions of Refs. [9,12] concerning 2D electron gas in materials with honeycomb lattice.…”
Section: Fig 3 A) Position Of the Fermi Level For Ws2 In A Magneticsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…As shown in Figs. 6 and 7, equations (55) and (56) are valid for the ideal 2D electron gas and for that in group-VI dichalogenides in the parabolic approximation of energy band for typical material parameters. Our calculations for monolayer graphene and WS 2 in the nonparabolic bands model suggest that Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the nature of the complicated spot structures should originate from an electronic effect rather than a simple relief modulation. These observations lead to the hypothesis that the observed interference features do not relate to oscillations of charge density 13,14 of surface states in the vicinity of a scattering center, but they are likely the result of electron interference due to the presence of a subsurface nanoinclusion reflecting bulk electrons. It is expected that the magnitude of the dI / dV signal as well as its specific spatial distribution reflects somehow the size, shape, and depth of location of the nanoinclusion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This is apparent because in the high-temperature limit the theory of Friedel oscillations [11] predicts only a small temperature dependence: i) for high temperatures (300 K) significant deviations from the expected r −3 decay of the oscillation amplitude are expected only for relatively large distances from the scatterer. ii) the ratio r of the oscillation amplitude at 8 K and 300 K is near unity (r ∼ 0.8) for distances between 5 nm and 10 nm from the scattering center.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%