Fri0411 comparable Clinical Responses but Higher Treatment Adherence of Secukinumab Compared to TNF Inhibitors in Spondyloarthritis Patients: Long Term Prospective Observational Study in a Tertiary Hospital of Greece

Abstract

BackgroundData regarding effectiveness and persistence to therapy with anti-IL17 agent secukinumab (SEC) in spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients of real world clinical practice are very limited.ObjectivesTo assess characteristics of SpA patients starting therapy with SEC versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) in routine clinical care and compare clinical responses and treatment retention at 2 years.MethodsAll patients starting a bDMARD in the Rheumatology Department of the University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, are included in a prospective observational study after their written informed consent. Data concerning disease activity at pre-specified time-points, drugs, comorbidities and any adverse events are recorded. For the present study we analyzed all consecutive patients with axial (AxSpA) or peripheral SpA (pSpA) starting or switching bDMARD therapy, either a TNFi or SEC from 1/2015 till 12/2018. We excluded patients with IBD-related SpA, patients starting ustekinumab (or apremilast) and patients switching from a bio-originator to a biosimilar TNFi. We compared disease activity scores improvement at 6 months using linear regression analysis and treatment retention using Kaplan-Meier survival curves with log-rank test and Cox regression. Inverse propensity score weighting (IPW) was used to adjust for the potential confounding of gender, age, disease duration, previous bDMARDs and csDMARDs number, diagnosis (AxSpA vs pSpA), presence of peripheral arthritis and co-therapy with csDMARDs.ResultsA total of 239 patients with SpA started/switched bDMARD (SEC:69, TNFis:170). SEC was the ≥3rd bDMARD in 63% of patients compared to 17% of TNFis (p<0.001). Patients’ characteristics at baseline were comparable except for disease duration (median (IQR): 5 (1.5-11) years in SEC vs. 0.9 (0.2-4.6) in TNFis, p<0.001). AxSpA was the diagnosis in 78% patients starting SEC and 79% starting TNFis while peripheral arthritis was slightly more common with SEC (81% vs 76% in TNFis). Monotherapy tended to be more common with SEC compared to TNFis (52% vs 42%, p=0.16). Baseline disease activity regarding both axial and peripheral arthritis was comparable in the two groups.Unadjusted 2-year treatment retention was similar in the two groups, both overall (SEC: 63%, TNFi: 56%, p=0.18) and due to failure or adverse events. However, when we selected only patients on 1st or 2nd bDMARD (SEC:26, TNFis:131), 2-year survival of SEC was higher than that of TNFis (95% vs. 57%, p=0.027). Similarly, SEC tended to have higher survival than TNFis in patients with pSpA (p=0.11). After IPW, SEC administration was an independent predictor for higher bDMARD retention overall [HR (95%CI)=0.48(0.33-0.69), p<0.001] and specifically due to discontinuation for failure [HR=0.58 (0.38-0.88), p=0.011] and for adverse events [HR=0.21 (0.08-0.62), p=0.004].Mean BASDAI and ASDAS improvements at 6 months were similar in patients with AxSpA receiving SEC or TNFis [Mean(SD) δBASDAI: 1.6 (2.5) vs 1.4(2.5) respectively (p=0.78) and δASDAS: 0.7 (1.4) vs 1.0 (1.5), p=0...

<p>Impact of Secukinumab on Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis: Current Perspectives</p>

“…71 Several other small-scale observational and survey-based studies have been published, evaluating the effectiveness of secukinumab in a real-world setting, although a detailed discussion of their results is outside the scope of the present review. [72][73][74][75][76][77] It is noteworthy that much of the real-world data submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com…”