2016
DOI: 10.3906/sag-1410-47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency of twelve carcinogenic human papilloma virus types among women from the South Backa region, Vojvodina, Serbia

Abstract: Background/aim: The aim of this study was to determine the presence and age distribution of different oncogenic human papilloma virus (HPV) types in women in the South Backa region and its relationship to Pap results. Materials and methods:In a group of 1087 women with normal and abnormal cytology, the commercial HR HPV Real-TM kit (Sacace Biotechnologies, Italy) was used.Results: Overall, 50.5% of the women were HPV positive. The presence of HPV types 18, 31, 51, and 58 was significantly influenced by age, wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the female population from Kosovo, the crude overall prevalence of infection with any of the 14 HR-HPVs was estimated at 13.1%. Interestingly, in our study population the overall HR-HPV prevalence in NILM was lower than in studies on a total of 10.744 eligible women from other countries in central and eastern Europe (9.7%; 95% CI: 6.1-15.2% vs. 18.0%; 95% CI: 17.0-19.0%, respectively) [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], with reported high incidence rates of cervical cancer and related mortality rates [1]. Our results were concordant with those obtained in the largest study in the region to date, performed on 4.199 Slovenian women (HR-HPV prevalence of 10.7%; cervical cancer incidence rate per 100,000: 13.4; mortality rate due to cervical cancer per 100,000: 6.1) [1,14], as well as with global data (HR-HPV prevalence of 10.4%; cervical cancer incidence rate per 100,000: 15.1; mortality rate due to cervical cancer per 100,000: 7.6) [1,5].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…In the female population from Kosovo, the crude overall prevalence of infection with any of the 14 HR-HPVs was estimated at 13.1%. Interestingly, in our study population the overall HR-HPV prevalence in NILM was lower than in studies on a total of 10.744 eligible women from other countries in central and eastern Europe (9.7%; 95% CI: 6.1-15.2% vs. 18.0%; 95% CI: 17.0-19.0%, respectively) [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], with reported high incidence rates of cervical cancer and related mortality rates [1]. Our results were concordant with those obtained in the largest study in the region to date, performed on 4.199 Slovenian women (HR-HPV prevalence of 10.7%; cervical cancer incidence rate per 100,000: 13.4; mortality rate due to cervical cancer per 100,000: 6.1) [1,14], as well as with global data (HR-HPV prevalence of 10.4%; cervical cancer incidence rate per 100,000: 15.1; mortality rate due to cervical cancer per 100,000: 7.6) [1,5].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…There was a significant difference in the prevalence of total HR HPV infections across the various age groups (χ 2 test, χ 2 = 264.415, p < 0.001) ( Supplementary Materials Table S1 ). More precisely, the first peak was recorded under the age of 31 years, which was in line with the previous study [ 44 ]; then, it decreased slightly and maintained a plateau in the middle-age group of women (31–60 years), followed by a second peak in the group after 61 years ( Figure 4 ). Age at first sexual activity corresponds with the first peak [ 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We compared our data with these ones of other Balkan countries. In Macedonia the most common reported types are HPV16 (28.4%), HPV31 (12.1%) and HPV66 (7.9%) [Duvlis S et al, 2001]; in Greece -HPV16 (23.3%) followed by HPV53 (21.6%) [Stamataki P et al, 2010]; in Turkey -HPV16 (32%), HPV18 (8%) and HPV31 (6%) [Dursun P et al, 2013]; in Serbia -HPV16 (37.3%), HPV31 (31.7%) and HPV51 (15.5%) [Kovacevic G et al, 2016]; in Romania -HPV16 (28.1%), HPV53 (14.5%) and HPV51 (13.5%) [Ursu RG et al, 2011]. Obviously, the high incidence of medium-risk HPV66 is characteristic mainly for Bulgarian and Macedonian patients, but it is not observed in other Balkan countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%