2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5048012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free-layer-thickness-dependence of the spin galvanic effect with spin rotation symmetry

Abstract: Spin-orbit coupling near the surface of a ferromagnetic metal gives rises to spin-to-charge conversion with symmetry different from the conventional inverse spin Hall effect. We have previously observed this spin galvanic effect with spin rotation symmetry (SGE-SR) in a spin valve under a temperature gradient. Here we show there are two processes that contribute to the SGE-SR, one of which is sensitive to the free magnetic layer thickness, while the other only depends on the interface of the free layer. Based … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other one is to employ the magnetic order. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] The pure ferromagnet (FM) material can be naturally served as spin current source of the z-polarized spin current, [14,15] because the system symmetry can be broken by the FM magnetization. Even if neglecting intrinsic contributions to both SHE and Rashba effect, the z-polarized spin current in FM/nonmagnetic interface is still predicated due to the interface spin current effect, [16,17] and soon is observed in FM/light metal (LM) multilayers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The other one is to employ the magnetic order. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] The pure ferromagnet (FM) material can be naturally served as spin current source of the z-polarized spin current, [14,15] because the system symmetry can be broken by the FM magnetization. Even if neglecting intrinsic contributions to both SHE and Rashba effect, the z-polarized spin current in FM/nonmagnetic interface is still predicated due to the interface spin current effect, [16,17] and soon is observed in FM/light metal (LM) multilayers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if neglecting intrinsic contributions to both SHE and Rashba effect, the z-polarized spin current in FM/nonmagnetic interface is still predicated due to the interface spin current effect, [16,17] and soon is observed in FM/light metal (LM) multilayers. [18][19][20][21] Besides FM order, antiferromagnet (AFM) order can also be used to modulate the polarization of spin current based on the same reason, named magnetic SHE. [22] The z-polarized spin current has been observed, not only in non-collinear AFM with broken spin conservation, [23] but also in collinear AFM with spin conservation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 10 . The reverse effect -the inverse transverse spin Hall effect with spin rotation -was also detected in the similar structure [68], as shown in Fig. 16(c-d).…”
Section: Experimental Observation Of Conversion Between Charge Currenmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The effective coefficient 𝜃 for the transverse spin Hall effect with spin rotation was extrapolated to be 4.8 0.6 10 . The reverse effect -the inverse transverse spin Hall effect with spin rotation -was also detected in the similar structure [68], as shown in Fig. 16(c-d).…”
Section: Experimental Observation Of Conversion Between Charge Curren...mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…For example, spin polarization generated by the anomalous or planar Hall effects need to cross a ferromagnetic/nonmagnetic interface at which spin filtering and spinorbit precession can occur [105,106]. We also note that there are interesting ways that spin direction and the direction of charge flow can be interchanged, effects again associated with spin-orbit coupling known as spin swapping [107] or spin rotation [108][109][110]. There are additionally ideas for generating such spin polarizations using antiferromagnets [111], chiral antiferromagnets [112], and non-collinear antiferromagnets, e.g.…”
Section: Open Scientific Questionsmentioning
confidence: 85%