2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-021-06251-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture liaison services in Ireland—how do we compare to international standards?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior studies show fractures, particularly vertebral fractures, are underreported in Ireland. ( 27 , 28 , 29 , 32 ) We have not performed analyses of those with and without these validated fractures, which could affect our results. Risk factors and fractures are categorized simply as binary variables, rather than weighted based on a dose, duration, or severity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Prior studies show fractures, particularly vertebral fractures, are underreported in Ireland. ( 27 , 28 , 29 , 32 ) We have not performed analyses of those with and without these validated fractures, which could affect our results. Risk factors and fractures are categorized simply as binary variables, rather than weighted based on a dose, duration, or severity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 4 ) The cost of managing those who fracture will double by 2030. ( 25 ) Despite some progress in understanding fracture admissions to public hospitals among older persons, ( 26 , 27 , 28 ) national validated data do not exist related to the prevalence of osteoporosis or incidence of major osteoporotic fracture. ( 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ) This may be contributing to why osteoporosis is not a national healthcare priority.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, capturing the patient very early after their fracture is essential. 20 Knowing that half of all hip fracture patients have had a warning fracture, we should then be able to predict who is at risk of a hip fracture and take steps to prevent such occurrences. History of fracture at other sites also increases the risks of future fractures, for example, one study showed that after sustain ing a distal forearm fracture, the incidence of a subsequent fracture was 55% by 10 years and 80% by 20 years.…”
Section: Risk Assessment For Osteoporosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…National publications suggest that available data reflect the ‘tip of the iceberg,’ and the financial costs of managing people with these fractures will double during this decade, rising to €2billion by 2030 [ 5 – 7 ]. Recent programs established national standards for the management and audit of hip fracture care among adults aged ≥ 60 years of age and fracture liaison services [ 8 , 9 ]. These reflect the current state of fragility fracture care, variation in osteoporosis diagnosis, risk assessment and management, some progress, while also highlighting substantial needs including increases in resources, data, policy, priority, and logistics [ 3 , 5 – 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%