2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.sysarc.2012.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FPGA-based architecture for the real-time computation of 2-D convolution with large kernel size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For substitute algorithms that improve the efficiency of convolution kernel modules [4][5][6][7], the computational complexity and hardware consumption will shrink in proportion with the number of MSAs by applying a recurrent decomposition. Thus, these schemes can benefit from RD architectures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For substitute algorithms that improve the efficiency of convolution kernel modules [4][5][6][7], the computational complexity and hardware consumption will shrink in proportion with the number of MSAs by applying a recurrent decomposition. Thus, these schemes can benefit from RD architectures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the benefits apply to all MSAs types (e.g. SA [4], LUT [5], and log 2 and inverse-log 2 approximations [6]), as their computational complexities all reduce proportionally with the number of MSAs.…”
Section: A Fpga Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[4–8]. The filtering operation can be performed either in spatial domain or frequency domain however since the images are inherently encoded in spatial domain therefore the spatial domain filtering is preferred [9, 10]. In spatial domain, the filtering operation is carried out by convolving the filter mask with neighborhood pixels of input image [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This coefficient approximation may adversely effects the accuracy of filtered outputs. The second approach is based on reducing the total count of multipliers required by the filter design by reducing effective coefficients count without any change in its value therefore accurately calculates filtered outputs [9, 15–19]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%