2002
Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
70
1
1
0
Citation Types
0
18
1
0
Year Published
2001
2021
Publication Types
Select...
65
3
3
Relationship
3
68
Authors
Journals
Cited by 71 publications
(19 citation statements)
References 6 publications
0
18
1
0
“…Therefore, although we observed no difference in the management of depression for female vs. male patients, we consider it important to report this negative finding so as to avoid contributing to publication bias. 22,23 Interestingly, our findings contrast with a consistent pattern in many other studies suggesting that women are less likely than men to receive intensive interventions for a range of conditions. [1][2][3][4] Our study was not designed to understand the reasons for lack of gender differences, but our findings raise intriguing possibilities.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…Therefore, although we observed no difference in the management of depression for female vs. male patients, we consider it important to report this negative finding so as to avoid contributing to publication bias. 22,23 Interestingly, our findings contrast with a consistent pattern in many other studies suggesting that women are less likely than men to receive intensive interventions for a range of conditions. [1][2][3][4] Our study was not designed to understand the reasons for lack of gender differences, but our findings raise intriguing possibilities.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…In recent years, a number of special issues of journals have been devoted to peer review, but by and large, these discussions have been discipline specific. As Rennie (2002), Siler et al (2015), and others noted, there has been only modest exchange among researchers in the social sciences, biomedicine, and information science in investigations of manuscript review, despite the fact that many of the same challenges emerge in different disciplines. Funding for cross-disciplinary conferences (and edited volumes resulting from these conferences) would allow researchers from different areas to share knowledge, insights, and potential solutions.…”
Section: Prioritize Funding For Research On Manuscript Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the congresses began, the world literature on scientific peer review and publication amounted to fewer than 5 articles a year. 12 This rapidly changed and by 1999 was around 200 articles per year. The number of abstracts submitted to the Peer Review Congresses increased from 50 in 1989 to 260 in 2017.…”
Section: From 1989 To 2017mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of registrants has increased from fewer than 300 in 1989 to nearly 600 in 2017. When the congresses began, the world literature on scientific peer review and publication amounted to fewer than 5 articles a year . This rapidly changed and by 1999 was around 200 articles per year.…”
Section: From 1989 To 2017mentioning
confidence: 99%
