1970
DOI: 10.1086/111044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Four-color and H-beta photometry of open clusters - V - NGC 752.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
48
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…j Applied luminosity corrections are from Fig. 6 of Crawford & Barnes (1970) and the c 1 term in the Crawford (1975) calibration. Data for giants are excluded from the analysis.…”
Section: Assessing M67 Color Indices: Further Results For Two Importamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…j Applied luminosity corrections are from Fig. 6 of Crawford & Barnes (1970) and the c 1 term in the Crawford (1975) calibration. Data for giants are excluded from the analysis.…”
Section: Assessing M67 Color Indices: Further Results For Two Importamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…d These data have been standardized by using Landolt (1983) standards (see x 3.2 of TJ05). e The first abbreviation stands for Crawford & Barnes (1969). The zero-point consistency of data from the two papers is established by TJ92.…”
Section: Magnitudes: Establishing Zero Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be emphasized in this particular case that, unlike NGC 3680, the DDO result (−0.16) differs from that of the spectroscopy (−0.05) by more than 0.1 dex. A significant improvement occurs in the results from uvbyHβ photometry, where the m 1 data of Twarog (1983) exhibited a systematic offset compared to that of Crawford & Barnes (1970) and Nissen (1988) Despite its proximity to the Sun, there have been surprisingly few spectroscopic studies of stars within NGC 752. At high (2004) dismiss all previous metallicity estimates as either irrelevant or unreliable, a careful analysis confirms that they are remarkably consistent, with most comparisons of the absolute scale distorted by differences among the metallicity zero points.…”
Section: Ngc 752mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…(b) Averages of measurements by Johnson (1953);Roman (1955);Johnson (1961); Rohlfs & Vanysek (1962); Arp (1962); Eggen (1963); Crawford & Barnes (1970); Patenaude (1978); Hardy (1979);Nicolet (1981); Twarog (1983); Barry et al (1987);Nissen (1988); Mazzei & Pigatto (1988); Eggen (1989); Francic (1989);Boesgaard (1991); Dzervitis & Paupers (1993);Carraro et al (1993); Meynet et al (1993);Daniel et al (1994); Piatti et al (1995); Dinescu et al (1995); Milone et al (1995); Claria et al (1996); Dutra & Bica (2000); Loktin & Beshenov (2001); Blake (2002); Blake & Rucinski (2004); Salaris et al (2004); Bartašiūtė et al (2007);Taylor (2007); and Giardino et al (2008).…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%