2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0376-7388(99)00215-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fouling effects of polysaccharides and humic acid in nanofiltration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
55
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During the peat water filtration, rejection of humic substances is not only affected by the membrane pore size. The accumulation of humic substances on the polysulfone membrane is also attributed to hydrophobic interaction between the membrane surface and humic substances molecules [33,34]. The increase of polysulfone concentration improves the membrane hydrophobicity, which then escalates the humic substances accumulation on the membrane surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the peat water filtration, rejection of humic substances is not only affected by the membrane pore size. The accumulation of humic substances on the polysulfone membrane is also attributed to hydrophobic interaction between the membrane surface and humic substances molecules [33,34]. The increase of polysulfone concentration improves the membrane hydrophobicity, which then escalates the humic substances accumulation on the membrane surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Membrane separation processes can be tailored to meet the wanted degree of purification by choosing the appropriate membranes with convenient membrane weight cut offs (MWCOs) and the right operational conditions, such as applied pressures. The choice of membrane and operating conditions has a considerable impact on the purification efficiency, on the process problems (such as membrane fouling), and the economics of the fractionation process (Mänttäri et al 2000;Persson and Jönsson 2010;Koivula et al 2011;Puro et al 2011).…”
Section: Fractionation Of Pretreatment Effluentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both the un-grafted and the UV-grafted membranes, before and after NF experiments with humic acid solution, the system was washed with deionized water and the pure water permeation flux (J wf ) was measured again in order to evaluate the irreversible fouling in terms of pure water flux reduction, called hereafter irreversible fouling factor (FR w ). This is determined as follows [26,27].…”
Section: Membrane Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%