1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf00158737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foucault, sociology, and the problem of human agency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The broader location of the human sciences on the ‘modern episteme ’ is the result of the implosion of classical thought with the appearance of the figure of humankind as both the foundation of all positive knowledge and an object of knowledge among others. The human sciences occupy a fuzzy space in a volume defined by three axes: one of philosophical reflection; a second of the mathematical and physical sciences; and finally, of the sciences of language, life and labour, that is, linguistics, biology and economics (Smart 1982: 141, n.12). While they draw from each of these three axes, the human sciences are closer to the positive disciplines of the third.…”
Section: Episteme and Economymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The broader location of the human sciences on the ‘modern episteme ’ is the result of the implosion of classical thought with the appearance of the figure of humankind as both the foundation of all positive knowledge and an object of knowledge among others. The human sciences occupy a fuzzy space in a volume defined by three axes: one of philosophical reflection; a second of the mathematical and physical sciences; and finally, of the sciences of language, life and labour, that is, linguistics, biology and economics (Smart 1982: 141, n.12). While they draw from each of these three axes, the human sciences are closer to the positive disciplines of the third.…”
Section: Episteme and Economymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Smart (1982: 127), this configuration accounts for the remorseless demystification, critical self‐examination and reflexivity of the human sciences, to which sociology is especially prone. It also manifests itself in the promiscuity by which ‘frontiers become blurred, intermediary and composite disciplines multiply endlessly, and in the end their proper object may disappear altogether’ (Foucault 1970: 58).…”
Section: Episteme and Economymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agency also seems to vary according to species because entities have different capacities in the realm of action. In the case of humans, agency is usually associated with the capacity to make the world meaningful (Casper, 1994), to constitute representations (Smart, 1982), or to shape the world according to one's intentions (Bruum & Langlais, 2003). More fundamentally, human agency is distinguished by the capacity to choose between different courses of action.…”
Section: The Resistance and Representation Of Artifactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The very basis of modem social theory, its 'problems, dilemmas, and differences are in fact a necessary feature of its conditions of possibility', and so it is with Giddens's problem in the way that structure is 'invoked' t o account for the subject. Smart seems to suggest that Foucault resolves the issue in the formula that 'we live in a world of programmes, but the world does not follow a programme' (Smart, 1982 : 1 2 1 4 1 ) , but this appears t o be precisely what Giddens is arguing. 3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%