2018
DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2018.1523467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fostering advances to neuropsychological assessment based on the Research Domain Criteria: The bridge between cognitive functioning and physiology

Abstract: Objectives: The current review aimed to explore the advances in neuropsychological assessment in light of a recent research framework designed to improve our knowledge on mental health the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC). Methods: RDoC proposals on neuropsychological tests were reviewed across the RDoC cognitive systems domain. The focus is on the physiological unit of analysis and the potential applications are illustrated given the functional relevance of RDoC constructs to psychopathological and neurologica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 171 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TARA and Engage did not take advantage of this novel approach to measure efficacy and have not included biological or other units of analysis, although they used neuroscientific evidence to consubstantiate their interventions. Using the RDoC' units of analysis to search for evidence of validity is a promising new venue, even if including assessment measures from several research fields requires the interplay between areas of knowledge, multidisciplinary teams, and longer assessment procedures, making this a costly and demanding endeavor (Geraldo et al, 2018). As such, it is not clear how it will be achieved in mainstream intervention studies.…”
Section: Methodological Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…TARA and Engage did not take advantage of this novel approach to measure efficacy and have not included biological or other units of analysis, although they used neuroscientific evidence to consubstantiate their interventions. Using the RDoC' units of analysis to search for evidence of validity is a promising new venue, even if including assessment measures from several research fields requires the interplay between areas of knowledge, multidisciplinary teams, and longer assessment procedures, making this a costly and demanding endeavor (Geraldo et al, 2018). As such, it is not clear how it will be achieved in mainstream intervention studies.…”
Section: Methodological Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The domains and constructs are not designed to be independent, but rather promote comprehensive and tailored interventions (Clark et al, 2017). In other words, it is not intended to isolate specific constructs to intervention, but rather consider multiple RDoC constructs of interest while defining a unique profile of intervention (Alexopoulos & Arean, 2014;Geraldo, Azeredo, Pasion, Dores, & Barbosa, 2018). Despite the focus on positive valence system-the core system to explain depression in later-life-the Engage program also includes additional constructs that may moderate the efficacy in intervention, namely loss, arousal, and cognitive control (Alexopoulos et al, 2015(Alexopoulos et al, , 2016(Alexopoulos et al, , 2017Alexopoulos & Arean, 2014).…”
Section: Engagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compromised VSTM is often seen in aging, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, and depression (e.g., Norton et al, 2020;Xie et al, 2019;Xie, Cappiello, et al, 2018;Xie, Li, et al, 2018). The functional integrity of VSTM has therefore been proposed as a transdiagnostic indicator of overall mental health (Geraldo et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compromised VSTM is often seen in aging, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, and depression (e.g., Norton et al, 2020;Xie, Berry, Lustig, Deldin, & Zhang, 2019;Xie, Cappiello, et al, 2018;Xie, Li, Zou, Sun, & Shi, 2018). The functional integrity of VSTM has therefore been proposed as a transdiagnostic indicator of overall mental health (Geraldo, Azeredo, Pasion, Dores, & Barbosa, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%