2007
DOI: 10.1080/10635150701397635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fossils, Molecules, Divergence Times, and the Origin of Lissamphibians

Abstract: A review of the paleontological literature shows that the early dates of appearance of Lissamphibia recently inferred from molecular data do not favor an origin of extant amphibians from temnospondyls, contrary to recent claims. A supertree is assembled using new Mesquite modules that allow extinct taxa to be incorporated into a time-calibrated phylogeny with a user-defined geological time scale. The supertree incorporates 223 extinct species of lissamphibians and has a highly significant stratigraphic fit. So… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
240
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(256 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
15
240
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The time-calibrated tree is available in the electronic supplementary material, file S1, and the estimated topology and dates are congruent with several recent analyses [30,56,57] ), despite the higher richness in tropical regions (strongly suggesting ecological constraints on dispersal in this direction).…”
Section: Results (A) Tree-based Analysessupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The time-calibrated tree is available in the electronic supplementary material, file S1, and the estimated topology and dates are congruent with several recent analyses [30,56,57] ), despite the higher richness in tropical regions (strongly suggesting ecological constraints on dispersal in this direction).…”
Section: Results (A) Tree-based Analysessupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This age and that recently estimated for the split between amphibians and amniotes (late Devonian; ref. 26) seem too old according to the fossil record (27). A Mesozoic origin for salamanders has been proposed based on the fossil record (28,29), and by most of the molecular studies available so far (19,24,25), although a late Paleozoic diversification of salamanders has also been suggested (23).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the analyses, we used the Aln-all and Alnpart datasets and employed seven calibration points as follows. (1) The split of Cryptobranchidae and Salamandroidae: ~151-170 million years ago (Ma), based on the fossil record of salamandroid-like Iridotriton (Evans et al, 2005) for the minimum bound and a proposed origin of caudate (Marjanović and Laurin, 2007) for the maximum bound. (2) The split of Cryptobranchidae and Hynobiidae: >145 Ma, based on fossil salamander Chunerpeton; according to Roelants et al (2007) and Zhang et al (2008), slightly younger date was applied compared with the original date suggested by Gao and Shubin (2003).…”
Section: Molecular Datingmentioning
confidence: 99%