2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-14519-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Format-dependent and format-independent representation of sequential and simultaneous numerosity in the crow endbrain

Abstract: Humans’ symbolic counting skills are built on a primordial ability to approximately estimate the number of items, or numerosity. To date it is debated whether numerosities presented in categorically different formats, that is as temporal sequences versus spatial arrays, are represented abstractly in the brain. To address this issue, we identified the behavioral characteristics and neuronal codes for sequential and simultaneous number formats in crows. We find a format-dependent representation by distinct group… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
35
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The necessary stimulus configurations that control for a variety of temporal factors have been applied in studies with monkeys and crows. They show that the subjects indeed responded to the number of sequentially presented items, and not to temporal factors ( Nieder et al, 2006 ; Nieder, 2012 ; Ditz and Nieder, 2020 ).…”
Section: Numerosity Discrimination Accuracy With Sequentially Presentmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The necessary stimulus configurations that control for a variety of temporal factors have been applied in studies with monkeys and crows. They show that the subjects indeed responded to the number of sequentially presented items, and not to temporal factors ( Nieder et al, 2006 ; Nieder, 2012 ; Ditz and Nieder, 2020 ).…”
Section: Numerosity Discrimination Accuracy With Sequentially Presentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Detailed performance data for the enumeration of visual sequences of flashed dots are available for two monkeys (Figure 4B; Nieder, 2012) and two crows ( Figure 4C; Ditz and Nieder, 2020). With an average Weber fraction of 0.31 (+/− 0.17), the two monkeys showed significantly better accuracy then the two crows with a Weber fraction of 0.59 (+/− 0.13) (p < 0.05; two-tailed paired t-test; n = 4) ( Figure 4D).…”
Section: Numerosity Discrimination Accuracy With Sequentially Presentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations