2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-39637-3_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formal Verification of Cyber-Physical Systems: Coping with Continuous Elements

Abstract: Abstract. The formal verification of cyber-physical systems is a challenging task mainly because of the involvement of various factors of continuous nature, such as the analog components or the surrounding environment. Traditional verification methods, such as model checking or automated theorem proving, usually deal with these continuous aspects by using abstracted discrete models. This fact makes cyber-physical system designs error prone, which may lead to disastrous consequences given the safety and financi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, over-approximation in the computations is reduced by LP methods (e.g. [39]), SMT solvers [40], and higher-order-logic theorem proving (e.g [41]). …”
Section: Formal Verification Of Systems With Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, over-approximation in the computations is reduced by LP methods (e.g. [39]), SMT solvers [40], and higher-order-logic theorem proving (e.g [41]). …”
Section: Formal Verification Of Systems With Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly the CPS design process is multi-disciplinary, which means existing tools and techniques-other than perhaps for the cyber portion-may not be adequate. For instance, CPS design requires special modeling techniques [5], more sophisticated formal verification methods [6] and may even require cyber-physical codesign tools [7].…”
Section: -Real-time Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been calls for a science and technology foundation for CPS design that is model-based, precise, and predictable [20] while supporting integration of a range of semantic bases [21]. The state of the art has been characterised as almost exclusively involving discrete abstractions of continuous behaviour [22], although several model-based approaches, including that of Ptolemy [23], support heterogeneous modelling and simulation.…”
Section: A Current Capabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%