2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2009.07.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest management planning expert system for wildfire damage reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following criteria were evaluated: effectiveness, usefulness, understanding of questions and user friendliness, and the outcome were presented as a percentage, from 0 to 100%. Similar evaluations of decision support systems were performed by Mahaman (2002Mahaman ( , 2003, Gonza-lez-Andujar (2006), Kaloudis (2010).…”
Section: Controlmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The following criteria were evaluated: effectiveness, usefulness, understanding of questions and user friendliness, and the outcome were presented as a percentage, from 0 to 100%. Similar evaluations of decision support systems were performed by Mahaman (2002Mahaman ( , 2003, Gonza-lez-Andujar (2006), Kaloudis (2010).…”
Section: Controlmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Correctness of reasoning rules was equal 100%. Moreover, the system verification was achieved by systematic testing of the functionality of all its components during the implementation phase (Kaloudis et al, 2010). Having finished the implementation of all the rules and other components of the expert system, it was evaluated.…”
Section: Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developing and using wildfire risk assessment models can aid active and preventative forest management decision-making (González et al, 2006). The literature continues to expand with examples of wildfire risk analyses from around the globe (e.g., Atkinson et al, 2010;Dlamini, 2010;Kaloudis et al, 2010;Li et al, 2009;Zhijun et al, 2009). Planning scales for wildfire management range from incidentspecific to regional/national assessment, and applications include fire prevention, fire detection, deployment and initial attack dispatch, large fire management, and strategic planning and fuel management .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A wide range of models and decision support systems exist to help support risk-informed wildfire decision making, many of which specifically target one or more of the aforementioned sources of uncertainty [Ager et al, 2014;Chuvieco et al, 2012;Kaloudis et al, 2010;Calkin et al, 2011a;Noonan-Wright et al, 2011;Petrovic and Carlson, 2012;Rodríguez y Silva and González-Cabán, 2010;Salis et al, 2012]. In a prefire planning environment, structured decision processes can systematically and deliberatively address uncertainties with a range of techniques [Warmink et al, 2010;Marcot et al, 2012;Thompson et al, 2013a;Skinner et al, 2014].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%