Advances in Remote Sensing for Forest Monitoring 2022
DOI: 10.1002/9781119788157.ch9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest Fire Susceptibility Mapping by Integrating Remote Sensing and Machine Learning Algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The monthly distributions of Z and β for the cells and hydrological variables are illustrated in Figure 3, with the p-values derived from the seasonal MK test marked on each plot (green cell border) as an indicator to assess clusters with notable trends. Previous studies on hydrological trends have conventionally set a significance threshold of p (at which trends are deemed significant) at 0.01 [40]. For T mean , statistically significant increasing trends were observed for all cells, with less marked trends in the inland mountainous areas (Z between 7.5 and 8.25) and more marked trends in the inland flat and hilly areas (Z between 9.75 and 10.5).…”
Section: Seasonal Mk Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The monthly distributions of Z and β for the cells and hydrological variables are illustrated in Figure 3, with the p-values derived from the seasonal MK test marked on each plot (green cell border) as an indicator to assess clusters with notable trends. Previous studies on hydrological trends have conventionally set a significance threshold of p (at which trends are deemed significant) at 0.01 [40]. For T mean , statistically significant increasing trends were observed for all cells, with less marked trends in the inland mountainous areas (Z between 7.5 and 8.25) and more marked trends in the inland flat and hilly areas (Z between 9.75 and 10.5).…”
Section: Seasonal Mk Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The monthly distributions of Z and β for the cells and hydrological variables are illustrated in Figure 3, with the p-values derived from the seasonal MK test marked on each plot (green cell border) as an indicator to assess clusters with notable trends. Previous studies on hydrological trends have conventionally set a significance threshold of p (at which trends are deemed significant) at 0.01 [40]. The monthly distributions of Z and β for the cells and hydrological variables are illustrated in Figure 3, with the p-values derived from the seasonal MK test marked on each plot (green cell border) as an indicator to assess clusters with notable trends.…”
Section: Seasonal Mk Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysing such influencing variables various studies have utilized various statistical, physical and machine learning approaches to study fire behaviours, extents, patterns and susceptibility modelling. These approaches include logistic regression (LR) [ 35 ], multiple linear regression [ 36 ], frequency ratio method [ 37 ], analytical hierarchical process [ 38 , 39 ], fuzzy AHP [ 29 ], Generalized Linear Model (GLM) [ [40] , [41] , [42] , [43] ] and machine learning approaches [ 44 , 45 ]. While methods like WLC (Weighted Linear Composition Method) offer convenience to solve complex multi-criteria decision-making problems [ 46 ] and the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) has been used in the GIS-MCDA process, but they are based on hypothesis making them inaccurate [ 47 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another direction evaluates LST and its association with land use types, such as vegetation, water bodies, and built-up areas. These studies are crucial for understanding urban heat dynamics and evaluating the effects of landcover changes [32,33]. Exploration of the relationship between urban temperature and land use type began as early as the 1990s in the United States [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%