2001
DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(2001)113<0801:fbsrtc>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foreland-basin sequence response to collisional tectonism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sequence stratigraphic models applied to foreland basins suggest that nearshore accommodation is controlled by the interaction between varying rates of eustatic change and regional patterns of flexural subsidence caused by thrust-sheet loading (Posamentier and Allen 1993;Willis 2000;Castle 2001;Hoy and Ridgway 2003;Atchley et al 2004;Escalona and Mann 2006;Bera et al 2008). In this view, short-and longterm patterns of subsidence are assumed to be identical, such that in areas proximal to the thrust load, subsidence consistently exceeds the pace of eustatic fall, whereas in areas distal to the orogenic belt, the rate of sealevel fall is greater than the rate of subsidence at least part of the time.…”
Section: Eustasy and Subsidencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sequence stratigraphic models applied to foreland basins suggest that nearshore accommodation is controlled by the interaction between varying rates of eustatic change and regional patterns of flexural subsidence caused by thrust-sheet loading (Posamentier and Allen 1993;Willis 2000;Castle 2001;Hoy and Ridgway 2003;Atchley et al 2004;Escalona and Mann 2006;Bera et al 2008). In this view, short-and longterm patterns of subsidence are assumed to be identical, such that in areas proximal to the thrust load, subsidence consistently exceeds the pace of eustatic fall, whereas in areas distal to the orogenic belt, the rate of sealevel fall is greater than the rate of subsidence at least part of the time.…”
Section: Eustasy and Subsidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tectonically simple settings such as passive continental margins and tectonically active basins (e.g., retroarc foreland basins) are both assumed to subside differentially and in comparable ways (Posamentier and Allen 1993;Martinson et al 1998;Willis 2000;Varban and Plint 2008), though with foreland subsidence depending primarily on proximity to the thrust load rather than on crustal thinning. As a result, it has been argued that the rate of subsidence in foreland basins exceeds the rate of eustatic falls consistently in areas proximal to the orogenic belt, but only episodically in regions distal to the thrust load (Posamentier and Allen 1993;Willis 2000;Castle 2001;Hoy and Ridgway 2003;Escalona and Mann 2006;Bera et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This collision caused plate subduction and is attributed to the initiation of the current Appalachian Basin structure (Castle, 2001)..…”
Section: Fracture Detection In Central Appalachian Basinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. In particular, recent papers by Castle (1998, 2000, 2001) and Cotter & Driese (1998) provide sedimentological data, including photographs, of the various facies present in Lower Silurian and Upper Devonian strata of the Appalachian basin.…”
Section: Sedimentary Facies Tracts In the Appalachian Basinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forms in response to high rates of subsidence and sediment supply in the proximal foreland. After Castle (2001). (G) Incised valley‐fill facies tract.…”
Section: Sedimentary Facies Tracts In the Appalachian Basinmentioning
confidence: 99%