1984
DOI: 10.1080/00137918408967712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foreign Capital Budgeting Practices Used by the U.S. and Non-U.S. Multinational Companies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kim and Crick (1984) consider Stonehill and Nathanson's (1968) article to be the first major work to consider the decision within a normative financial framework. Eiteman and Stonehill (1982) summarise the additional complexities and problems of the international dimension as:…”
Section: International Capital Budgetingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kim and Crick (1984) consider Stonehill and Nathanson's (1968) article to be the first major work to consider the decision within a normative financial framework. Eiteman and Stonehill (1982) summarise the additional complexities and problems of the international dimension as:…”
Section: International Capital Budgetingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several American studies have been considered, (Stonehill and Nathanson 1968, Daniels 1971, Piper 1971, Baker and Beardsley 1973, Oblack and Helm 1980, Bavishi 1981, Wicks Kelly and Philippatos 1982, Stanley and Block 1983, Kim and Crick 1984, with a specific emphasis upon those studies that have concentrated upon the techniques of international capital budgeting, rather than the motivational aspects. In almost all of the studies considered the prime method of data collection was a questionnaire to the financial executives of the Fortune top 500 with other criteria as to number of overseas subsidiaries.…”
Section: Existing Empirical Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using any one, or a combination, of decision analysis techniques, the decision-maker is provided with an indication of what their investment decision ought to be, based on logical argument 14 . Previous research into the usage of decision analysis by companies has typically been survey-based and produced evidence of a difference between the decision analysis techniques described in the literature, and the decision analysis tools, which practitioners choose to use [15][16][17][18][19][20] . It appears that whilst decision analysts describe a range of decision analysis techniques, some of which are very sophisticated, organizational decision-makers are choosing to utilize only the most simplistic tools and concepts in their investment decision-making 21 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this time, a number of important papers have been written presenting the results of studies on various aspects of international capital budgeting. These studies present a range of research results on such aspects as: forms of income, measurements of evaluating the effectiveness of foreign investment, discount rates used in calculating this effectiveness, ways of taking risk into account when evaluating the effectiveness of FDI [Oblak, Helm 1980;Bavishi 1981;Wicks Kelly, Philippatos 1982;Stanley, Block 1983;Kim, Farragher, Crick 1984;Backer 1987;Wilson 1990;Goddard 1990;Shao, Shao 1993;Shao, Shao 1996;Buckley et al 1996;Drury, Tayles 1996;Graham, Harvey 2001;Holmén 2007;Różański 2010]. There is, however, much less work presenting methodologies for evaluating the effectiveness of foreign investment applicable to companies from developing countries [Tsamenyi, Skliarova 2005, Karaszewski et al 2009Jaworek 2013;Karaszewski et al 2014].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%