2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting the time of failure of landslides at slope-scale: A literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
104
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
2
104
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Distinct from the synchronous model, some correlation errors cannot be eliminated in the following asynchronous double difference observation model [18,20]:…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Distinct from the synchronous model, some correlation errors cannot be eliminated in the following asynchronous double difference observation model [18,20]:…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the ARTK model is significantly lower than that of the SRTK model [18]; hence, the difference between the two must be calculated by σ MSE(X ARTK −X SRTK ) before setting the detection threshold. Thereafter, the ∆X(t) term obtained by each epoch will be compared with the previous statistical value of 3*σ MSE(X ARTK −X SRTK ) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rainfall-triggered landslides pose a severe threat to societies on all continents [1,2]. Rainfall thresholds are therefore essential for characterizing landslide hazard and developing early warning systems [3][4][5]. Empirical approaches define thresholds on scales ranging from local [6,7] to regional and global [8,9], based on the observed relation between dated landslides and rainfall characteristics such as intensity, accumulation, duration, or antecedent rainfall (AR) conditions [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…parameters through a spatially extended infinite-slope stability model [25]. However, the large required data input for well-calibrated process-based thresholds explains their current limitation to mostly applications at the hillslope scale or through numerical simulations [4,21,[25][26][27].The estimation of empirical rainfall thresholds is also associated with additional sources of uncertainty. Firstly, landslide inventories are inherently biased towards high-impact landslide events and regions that are most accessible, while their accuracy is constrained by the scientific validity of the reporting sources, especially in data-scarce low-capacity environments [1,[28][29][30][31].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation