“…1,2 Spending money to save money seemed like a reasonable strategy in lowering serum lipids in primary prevention of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, particularly when pravastatin and simvastatin became available by generic name in April and June 2006, respectively, soon thereafter permitting the treatment of several patients for the same drug cost as treating 1 patient with either brand pravastatin (Pravachol) or brand simvastatin (Zocor). 3 Nevertheless, it has long been recognized that the small effect sizes associated with avoidance of adverse cardiovascular outcomes make the use of statins expensive even in secondary prevention, up to $1.1 million in drug cost in 2004 dollars to prevent 1 nonfatal stroke. 4 In an assessment of the cost-effectiveness of primary prevention, Pletcher et al (2009) used Markov modeling to estimate the economic and clinical effects of bringing all adults in the United States into compliance with Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) guidelines, finding that 11.1 million adults without coronary heart disease (CHD) would undergo newly initiated (9.7 million) or intensified (1.4 million) statin treatment.…”