2004
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0426(2004)021<0944:fvotpi>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecast Verification of the Polar Ice Prediction System (PIPS) Sea Ice Concentration Fields*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Starting from a forecast x i f and associated error covariance matrix P i f , the optimal solution x i a and a posteriori error covariance matrix P i a , are obtained by applying the Kalman gain K i to the innovation vector d : The time evolution of the state vector is predicted by a linear equation of the form where η i −1 is the prediction error, with covariance Q i −1 . This equation is applied to predict the evolution of the fields (state vector) and corresponding errors, that is used at time t i as forecast and a priori error matrix: The prediction equation used here is a simple persistence, relaxed to climatology ( x c ): Such formulation was used for ice cover estimation by Van Woert et al [2004]. The ν coefficient represents the autocorrelation between the fields at times t i −1 and t i .…”
Section: Estimation Problemsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Starting from a forecast x i f and associated error covariance matrix P i f , the optimal solution x i a and a posteriori error covariance matrix P i a , are obtained by applying the Kalman gain K i to the innovation vector d : The time evolution of the state vector is predicted by a linear equation of the form where η i −1 is the prediction error, with covariance Q i −1 . This equation is applied to predict the evolution of the fields (state vector) and corresponding errors, that is used at time t i as forecast and a priori error matrix: The prediction equation used here is a simple persistence, relaxed to climatology ( x c ): Such formulation was used for ice cover estimation by Van Woert et al [2004]. The ν coefficient represents the autocorrelation between the fields at times t i −1 and t i .…”
Section: Estimation Problemsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In assessing the ice concentration forecast skill of ACNFS, a skill score using the mean square error is computed based on the analysis of Murphy and Epstein [] and Van Woert et al . []. Following the notation of Van Woert et al .…”
Section: Forecast Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six hourly three-dimensional fields of temperature, salinity and ocean velocities for the same time period as the atmospheric forcing are linearly interpolated onto the model grid over a relaxation zone of width 100 km around the lateral boundaries as described in Holt and James (2001). Initial and six hourly boundary conditions for ice concentration and thickness are provided by the Polar Ice Prediction System (Preller and Posey, 1996;Woert et al, 2004) and interpolated onto the same relaxation zone. No restoring was applied to the domain interior.…”
Section: Surface and Boundary Forcingmentioning
confidence: 99%