2004
DOI: 10.1899/0887-3593(2004)023<0728:fsiata>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foodweb structure in a tropical Asian forest stream

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

12
104
4
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
12
104
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that the relative size between predator and prey, rather than prey species, is the decisive factor that determines prey choice, an observation also made by Woodward (2001) with regard to the foodweb of an English stream. A wide overlap of the diets of fish, shrimps and larger insects is also recorded from a Southern Chinese stream (Mantel et al 2004). Omnivory thus applies in its widest sense: everything that can mechanically be tackled and is physiologically acceptable (i.e.…”
Section: General Omnivorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that the relative size between predator and prey, rather than prey species, is the decisive factor that determines prey choice, an observation also made by Woodward (2001) with regard to the foodweb of an English stream. A wide overlap of the diets of fish, shrimps and larger insects is also recorded from a Southern Chinese stream (Mantel et al 2004). Omnivory thus applies in its widest sense: everything that can mechanically be tackled and is physiologically acceptable (i.e.…”
Section: General Omnivorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence from global studies indicates high variability in shredder occurrence and in breakdown rates across tropical sites (Boyero et al, 2012(Boyero et al, , 2015, which corroborates contrasting results obtained in tropical regions. A growing body of evidence emphasizes the importance of algal carbon in tropical food webs of forested small streams (Salas and Dudgeon, 2001;Mantel et al, 2004;Brito et al, 2006;Li and Dudgeon, 2008;Lau et al, 2009;Neres-Lima et al, 2016;Brett et al, 2017) and it has been claimed that the contribution of macroinvertebrate shredders to leaf breakdown is small in certain tropical running waters due their scarcity (Dudgeon and Wu, 1999;Dobson et al, 2002;Gonçalves et al, 2006bGonçalves et al, , 2007Ardón and Pringle, 2008;Alvim et al, 2015). On the other hand, there is contrary evidence of high diversity and abundance of macroinvertebrate shredders, high secondary production and importance on leaf breakdown (Cheshire et al, 2005;Camacho et al, 2009;Yule et al, 2009;Encalada et al, 2010;Masese et al, 2014;Tonin et al, 2014;Andrade et al, 2017;Neres-Lima et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes (d 13 C and d 15 N) has been increasingly applied in studies of aquatic food webs because of their capacity to reveal food assimilation, and thus actual energy transfer, rather than merely ingestion as indicated by gut-content analysis or feeding observations (e.g., Yoshioka et al 1994;Hall et al 2001;O'Reilly et al 2002;Mantel et al 2004;Li and Dudgeon 2008). Stable isotopes of samples preserved in formalin, ethanol, and formalin-ethanol (fixation in formalin followed by storage in ethanol) can yield trophic information that may allow investigation of temporal changes in food-web dynamics, especially where stored specimens from aquatic ecosystems subject to anthropogenic impacts are available (Vander Zanden et al 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, C-and N-rich compounds (e.g., fatty acids and amino acids) have been detected in preservation media such as formalin and ethanol (Von Endt 1994) suggesting that preservation will alter the isotopic signatures of consumers and thereby hinder the resolution and interpretation of trophic relationships. Despite this, some isotope-based trophic studies have used preserved samples without correction for any preservation effects, particularly in instances when concurrent gut-content analyses mandated some form of sample preservation (e.g., Hall et al 2001;Mantel et al 2004). Inconsistencies in the type or concentration of preservatives, and variations in preservation duration, also reduce the robustness of isotope-based trophic comparisons among stored samples, and these effects may be taxon-specific (e.g., Vander Zanden et al 2003, and references therein; Syväranta et al 2008;Carabel et al 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation