1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199805/06)28:3<423::aid-ejsp874>3.3.co;2-m
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
Food sharing and feeding another person suggest intimacy; two studies of American college students
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
19
4
2
2
Citation Types
1
25
0
0
Year Published
2012
2024
Publication Types
Select...
18
4
2
1
Relationship
0
25
Authors
Journals
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
References 0 publications
1
25
0
0
“…Research on the similarity bias (a review: Montoya & Horton, 2013), myside bias (Stanovich, West, & Toplak, 2013) show that we are prone to evaluate positively individuals who are like ourselves. As our stimulus couple only ate together, the results also extend the findings about food sharing (Miller et al, 1998) by showing that sharing the food is not necessary for the impression about a positive social relationship, eating praiseworthy food together may suffice. The findings are also closely related to the other stereotypical judgments based on what people eat, most often associated with masculine vs. feminine diet or vegetarian vs. meat-based diet (Vartanian, 2015;Vartanian et al, 2007).…”
Section: Eating Organic Food Evoked Positive and Negative Stereotypessupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Research on the similarity bias (a review: Montoya & Horton, 2013), myside bias (Stanovich, West, & Toplak, 2013) show that we are prone to evaluate positively individuals who are like ourselves. As our stimulus couple only ate together, the results also extend the findings about food sharing (Miller et al, 1998) by showing that sharing the food is not necessary for the impression about a positive social relationship, eating praiseworthy food together may suffice. The findings are also closely related to the other stereotypical judgments based on what people eat, most often associated with masculine vs. feminine diet or vegetarian vs. meat-based diet (Vartanian, 2015;Vartanian et al, 2007).…”
Section: Eating Organic Food Evoked Positive and Negative Stereotypessupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Although we could not find studies investigating this possibility, sharing food has always been considered a means of socializing and consolidating friendships [ 87 ] and thus can be an effective special case of intergroup contact. Indeed, the idea of improving intergroup relations through “multi-ethnic dinners” seems popular in small communities across the world, and some research suggests that sharing food is interpreted as a sign of social intimacy [ 88 ], while eating the same food leads to increased trust and cooperation among strangers [ 89 ]. Our results indicate that improving intergroup attitudes, in addition to being inherently beneficial, can also help enlarge individuals’ array of accepted food, but do not exclude that the reverse may be true—that is, it is possible that increasing individuals’ acceptance of novel food could help improve their intergroup attitudes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the emphasis on societal outcomes, in terms of social inclusion and sense of community, supports the arguments in favor of the sharing economy, suggesting that food sharing platforms can preserve its original mission of fostering social bonding (Habibi et al , 2016). Notably, it is also suggested that food sharing platforms can trigger, by leveraging digital technology, the feelings of caring and social connection that have been observed as traditionally associated with food sharing (Davies and Legg, 2018; Hamburg et al , 2014; Miller et al 1998). From the findings therefore the contribution of food sharing platforms’ business models to the food sector’s sustainability emerges as relevant and multifaceted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
