2019
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011400.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food fortification with multiple micronutrients: impact on health outcomes in general population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 160 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 In terms of evaluation, there are a few studies that have evaluated the impact of different calcium food fortification programs on markers of calcium metabolism in the blood, such as parathyroid hormone, serum calcium, and serum vitamin D. In two studies including 317 children, it was reported that fortification with only calcium resulted in a standard mean difference of -0.28 (95% CI: -0.50 to -0.06) in parathyroid hormone levels and one study in 231 children found a standard mean difference of -0.30 (95% CI: -0.56 to -0.04) in serum calcium levels. 57 In women, three studies with only calcium fortification found a standard mean difference of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.38-1.00) in serum vitamin D levels. The quality of the evidence was low.…”
Section: Evaluation and Impact Of Calcium Food Fortification Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 In terms of evaluation, there are a few studies that have evaluated the impact of different calcium food fortification programs on markers of calcium metabolism in the blood, such as parathyroid hormone, serum calcium, and serum vitamin D. In two studies including 317 children, it was reported that fortification with only calcium resulted in a standard mean difference of -0.28 (95% CI: -0.50 to -0.06) in parathyroid hormone levels and one study in 231 children found a standard mean difference of -0.30 (95% CI: -0.56 to -0.04) in serum calcium levels. 57 In women, three studies with only calcium fortification found a standard mean difference of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.38-1.00) in serum vitamin D levels. The quality of the evidence was low.…”
Section: Evaluation and Impact Of Calcium Food Fortification Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we recommend that trial authors use standardized elemental iron dosages, regimes and consumption timing in order to produce more homogenous outcomes ( Camaschella, 2017 ; WHO, 2016 ). Disclosure of the compound and the presence of other micronutrients in each supplement that may affect the outcome is also essential ( Das et al, 2019 ). Third, current literature does not evaluate the potency of IPC and ferrous iron in terms of improvements in relevant clinical outcomes, or the cost-effectiveness of each oral iron supplement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experience of fortification has been successfully conducted for zinc, iron, selenium, vitamin A, vitamin B complexes (e.g., folate, niacin, thiamine), vitamin C, vitamin D and vitamin E [72] enrichment of foods. It is now well accepted that micronutrient fortification of foods has the potential to significantly increase serum micronutrient concentrations, reduce the incidence of micronutrient deficiencies in public health (e.g., Pellagra, Beriberi, childhood rickets, xerophthalmia), reduce clinical manifestations of deficiencies (including goiter, anemia and neural tube defects), and improve overall nutritional status [73,74].…”
Section: Food Fortificationmentioning
confidence: 99%