2021
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202100863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Following Electroenzymatic Hydrogen Production by Rotating Ring–Disk Electrochemistry and Mass Spectrometry**

Abstract: File list (3) download file view on ChemRxiv 170121 MS file.pdf (1.13 MiB) download file view on ChemRxiv 170121 Supporting information.pdf (1.82 MiB)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(42 reference statements)
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using double-layer capacitance, we determined the surface area enhancement offered by the use of nanoITO to be 19 on glassy carbon electrodes (Figure S5; note that this is an estimate due to differences in specific capacitances of nanoITO and the underlying GC electrode); accounting for this enhancement yields a corrected electrocatalytic current density that remains >38× the current densities typically obtained on GC electrodes (>6× those typically obtained on PGEs) (Figure S6), reflecting the importance of ITO for efficient [FeFe]-hydrogenase (CpI) immobilization and orientation (improved H 2 production is not only due to increased electrode surface area). Control experiments on O 2 -deactivated hydrogenase from Figure S7 show >80% current loss at −0.8 V vs. SHE, further confirming that the electrocatalytic current originates from hydrogenase and not the nanoITO electrode, consistent with previous O 2 -deactivation experiments . The bioelectrode performance was also investigated under H 2 to understand if nanoITO could influence the reversibility of CpI.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using double-layer capacitance, we determined the surface area enhancement offered by the use of nanoITO to be 19 on glassy carbon electrodes (Figure S5; note that this is an estimate due to differences in specific capacitances of nanoITO and the underlying GC electrode); accounting for this enhancement yields a corrected electrocatalytic current density that remains >38× the current densities typically obtained on GC electrodes (>6× those typically obtained on PGEs) (Figure S6), reflecting the importance of ITO for efficient [FeFe]-hydrogenase (CpI) immobilization and orientation (improved H 2 production is not only due to increased electrode surface area). Control experiments on O 2 -deactivated hydrogenase from Figure S7 show >80% current loss at −0.8 V vs. SHE, further confirming that the electrocatalytic current originates from hydrogenase and not the nanoITO electrode, consistent with previous O 2 -deactivation experiments . The bioelectrode performance was also investigated under H 2 to understand if nanoITO could influence the reversibility of CpI.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…Control experiments on O 2 -deactivated hydrogenase from Figure S7 show >80% current loss at −0.8 V vs. SHE, further confirming that the electrocatalytic current originates from hydrogenase and not the nanoITO electrode, consistent with previous O 2 -deactivation experiments. 36 The bioelectrode performance was also investigated under H 2 to understand if nanoITO could influence the reversibility of CpI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the relative distribution of isotopologue products of acetylene, proton, and cyanide reduction assays, the isotope effects of hydrogen/deuterium addition were determined for these processes. Under conditions when a process involves two proton/deuteron transfer steps, each with the same isotope effect, the mole fraction of each of the isotopologue products can be expressed in terms of the isotope effect and the deuterium enrichment of the solvent by the following equations (see Supporting Information for derivation) 40,41…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the relative distribution of isotopologue products of acetylene, proton, and cyanide reduction assays, the isotope effects of hydrogen/deuterium addition were determined for these processes. Under conditions when a process involves two proton/deuteron transfer steps, each with the same isotope effect, the mole fraction of each of the isotopologue products can be expressed in terms of the isotope effect and the deuterium enrichment of the solvent by the following equations (see Supporting Information for derivation) , X 2 normalH : 0 normalD = I E 2 f normalH 2 false( I E f normalH + f normalD false) 2 X 1 normalH : 1 normalD = 2 I E f normalD f normalH false( I E f normalH + f normalD false) 2 X 0 normalH : 2 normalD = f normalD 2 false( I E f normalH + f normalD false) 2 where X 2H:0D , X 1H:1D , a...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation