2018
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201801438
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Fluorination of Black Phosphorus—Will Black Phosphorus Burn Down in the Elemental Fluorine?

Abstract: Black phosphorus (BP) represents a promising tunable bandgap alternative to graphene and other 2D materials in the field of semiconductors. However, its reactivity toward covalent modification of its surface (as a key to its bandgap adjustment) is scarcely reported. Here a method of covalent modification of BP involving reaction with fluorine is reported. Other allotropes of phosphorus are known to react violently with fluorine resulting in its complete burning down and formation of gaseous phosphorus pentaflu… Show more

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
36
6
5
0

Citation Types

5
25
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
45
1

Relationship

7
39

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 45 publications

(30 citation statements)
references

References 50 publications

5
25
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Three typical Raman peaks located at 360.9, 438.4, and 466.5 cm −1 can be donated to the A 1 g , B 2g , and A 2 g vibrational modes of P in BP QDs, and there are no peaks can be donated to PIL‐TFSI . Besides, it can be seen that there are only slight changes in the ratio of peak intensities and no additional peaks can be detected, indicating no significant changes in the crystallinity of the BP QDs after the encapsulation process, which is consistent with the previous literature …”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Nevertheless, the intensity located around 133.66 eV is slightly higher in the spectrum of BP‐PIL than that in pristine BP QDs, which can be explained by the overlap of PO and PF bonds (Figure e) . The fluorine is obviously visible in the XPS spectrum of the PIL‐TFSI encapsulated BP QDs as shown by the typical F 1s signal with the binding energy located at 688.29 eV (Figure d) which is consistent with the previous reports . Compare to the F 1s signals of PIL‐TFSI with the binding energy around 688.06 eV (Figure S2b, Supporting Information), there is an additional electronically signal of F 1s located around 695.01 eV that can be detected in the spectrum of BP‐PIL as shown in Figure f, which can be explained by the unintentional fluorination of BP QDs during the encapsulation process as well as the PF covalent bond created at the interface of BP QDs …”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…47‐1624) according to the previous reports . It can be seen that the peaks only exhibit a little shift (≈0.2°) in the pattern of BP‐PIL compared to pristine BP QDs, which can be explained by the possible formation of PF bonds taking place at the edges of BP QDs during the encapsulation process . The observed little swell from 10° to 40° can be ascribed to the amorphous PIL‐TFSI.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Three typical Raman peaks located at 360.9, 438.4, and 466.5 cm −1 can be donated to the A 1 g , B 2g , and A 2 g vibrational modes of P in BP QDs, and there are no peaks can be donated to PIL‐TFSI . Besides, it can be seen that there are only slight changes in the ratio of peak intensities and no additional peaks can be detected, indicating no significant changes in the crystallinity of the BP QDs after the encapsulation process, which is consistent with the previous literature …”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Nevertheless, the intensity located around 133.66 eV is slightly higher in the spectrum of BP‐PIL than that in pristine BP QDs, which can be explained by the overlap of PO and PF bonds (Figure e) . The fluorine is obviously visible in the XPS spectrum of the PIL‐TFSI encapsulated BP QDs as shown by the typical F 1s signal with the binding energy located at 688.29 eV (Figure d) which is consistent with the previous reports . Compare to the F 1s signals of PIL‐TFSI with the binding energy around 688.06 eV (Figure S2b, Supporting Information), there is an additional electronically signal of F 1s located around 695.01 eV that can be detected in the spectrum of BP‐PIL as shown in Figure f, which can be explained by the unintentional fluorination of BP QDs during the encapsulation process as well as the PF covalent bond created at the interface of BP QDs …”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…47‐1624) according to the previous reports . It can be seen that the peaks only exhibit a little shift (≈0.2°) in the pattern of BP‐PIL compared to pristine BP QDs, which can be explained by the possible formation of PF bonds taking place at the edges of BP QDs during the encapsulation process . The observed little swell from 10° to 40° can be ascribed to the amorphous PIL‐TFSI.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…36,37 The P 2p spectrum can be fitted with three peaks at 130.1, 130.9 and 134.5 eV, which can be assigned to P 2p 3/2 and P 2p 1/2 of BP, and P-O bonds, respectively. 34 All these results confirm the successful synthesis of ZnO@BP nanosheets.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 62%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Moreover, in literature, the B 1g and B 3g (B 2g in our simulations) modes were observed in an investigation of the edge phonons of black phosphorus crystals as reported in Reference [61], as well as in the work of Plutnar et al in Reference [66].…”
Section: Raman Spectroscopy
supporting
confidence: 72%