Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Fluoride varnishes for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
291
126
82
23
Citation Types
10
420
2
49
Year Published
Range
2000
20002026
2026Publication Types
Select...
421
27
12
6
Relationship
1
465
Authors
Journals
Cited by 466 publications
(481 citation statements)
References 48 publications
10
420
2
49
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…For all analytic models, net effects of the intervention are within the range reported in a systematic review of fluoride varnish, where the pooled estimate of prevented fraction in primary teeth was 33% (95% CI = 19%, 48%). (9) Also, our results are similar to findings from a study reported since that systematic review. In a 2‐year, community‐randomized trial among Canadian Aboriginal children aged 6 months–5 years, fluoride varnish and caregiver counseling reduced caries increment by an average of 2.8 surfaces per child, a prevented fraction of 18% (16).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…For all analytic models, net effects of the intervention are within the range reported in a systematic review of fluoride varnish, where the pooled estimate of prevented fraction in primary teeth was 33% (95% CI = 19%, 48%). (9) Also, our results are similar to findings from a study reported since that systematic review. In a 2‐year, community‐randomized trial among Canadian Aboriginal children aged 6 months–5 years, fluoride varnish and caregiver counseling reduced caries increment by an average of 2.8 surfaces per child, a prevented fraction of 18% (16).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This study is one of the first to report results on the effectiveness of various in-office applied fluoride treatments for caries prevention in high caries risk adults. The beneficial results of in-office applied 5% NaF varnish and 2% NaF gel/rinse or 1.23% APF gel are consistent with results reported by Cochrane Systematic Reviews regarding the effectiveness of varnish (Marinho et al 2013) and gel (Marinho et al 2015) in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents. Furthermore, our study found a dose–response relationship, with 2-plus in-office applied fluoride treatments/y providing greater benefit than a yearly application for caries prevention in high caries risk adults.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 88%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Age is an important factor that should be considered when estimating dental utilization rates among children. After adjusting for other variables, children from the older age groups (8-12 and 13-17) were significantly more likely to have received preventive dental care than those from the youngest age group (3)(4)(5)(6)(7). This finding is consistent with previous studies reporting that younger children exhibit relatively lower overall and preventive dental utilization (28,29).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 88%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…For all analytic models, net effects of the intervention are within the range reported in a systematic review of fluoride varnish, where the pooled estimate of prevented fraction in primary teeth was 33% (95% CI = 19%, 48%). (9) Also, our results are similar to findings from a study reported since that systematic review. In a 2‐year, community‐randomized trial among Canadian Aboriginal children aged 6 months–5 years, fluoride varnish and caregiver counseling reduced caries increment by an average of 2.8 surfaces per child, a prevented fraction of 18% (16).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This study is one of the first to report results on the effectiveness of various in-office applied fluoride treatments for caries prevention in high caries risk adults. The beneficial results of in-office applied 5% NaF varnish and 2% NaF gel/rinse or 1.23% APF gel are consistent with results reported by Cochrane Systematic Reviews regarding the effectiveness of varnish (Marinho et al 2013) and gel (Marinho et al 2015) in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents. Furthermore, our study found a dose–response relationship, with 2-plus in-office applied fluoride treatments/y providing greater benefit than a yearly application for caries prevention in high caries risk adults.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 88%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Age is an important factor that should be considered when estimating dental utilization rates among children. After adjusting for other variables, children from the older age groups (8-12 and 13-17) were significantly more likely to have received preventive dental care than those from the youngest age group (3)(4)(5)(6)(7). This finding is consistent with previous studies reporting that younger children exhibit relatively lower overall and preventive dental utilization (28,29).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 88%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…For all analytic models, net effects of the intervention are within the range reported in a systematic review of fluoride varnish, where the pooled estimate of prevented fraction in primary teeth was 33% (95% CI = 19%, 48%). (9) Also, our results are similar to findings from a study reported since that systematic review. In a 2‐year, community‐randomized trial among Canadian Aboriginal children aged 6 months–5 years, fluoride varnish and caregiver counseling reduced caries increment by an average of 2.8 surfaces per child, a prevented fraction of 18% (16).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This study is one of the first to report results on the effectiveness of various in-office applied fluoride treatments for caries prevention in high caries risk adults. The beneficial results of in-office applied 5% NaF varnish and 2% NaF gel/rinse or 1.23% APF gel are consistent with results reported by Cochrane Systematic Reviews regarding the effectiveness of varnish (Marinho et al 2013) and gel (Marinho et al 2015) in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents. Furthermore, our study found a dose–response relationship, with 2-plus in-office applied fluoride treatments/y providing greater benefit than a yearly application for caries prevention in high caries risk adults.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 88%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Age is an important factor that should be considered when estimating dental utilization rates among children. After adjusting for other variables, children from the older age groups (8-12 and 13-17) were significantly more likely to have received preventive dental care than those from the youngest age group (3)(4)(5)(6)(7). This finding is consistent with previous studies reporting that younger children exhibit relatively lower overall and preventive dental utilization (28,29).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 88%