2015
DOI: 10.3390/s151025831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorescence-Based Bioassays for the Detection and Evaluation of Food Materials

Abstract: We summarize here the recent progress in fluorescence-based bioassays for the detection and evaluation of food materials by focusing on fluorescent dyes used in bioassays and applications of these assays for food safety, quality and efficacy. Fluorescent dyes have been used in various bioassays, such as biosensing, cell assay, energy transfer-based assay, probing, protein/immunological assay and microarray/biochip assay. Among the arrays used in microarray/biochip assay, fluorescence-based microarrays/biochips… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 232 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To address these challenges, diverse methods or technologies have been developed, which can be divided into two methods: direct and indirect. Direct detection methods include molecular technologies, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR), fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) and serological technologies such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. Meanwhile, typical indirect methods detect morphological changes, transpiration rate changes and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) profiles, which correspond to the technologies of fluorescence imaging, hyperspectral techniques and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) [ 4 , 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address these challenges, diverse methods or technologies have been developed, which can be divided into two methods: direct and indirect. Direct detection methods include molecular technologies, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR), fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) and serological technologies such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. Meanwhile, typical indirect methods detect morphological changes, transpiration rate changes and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) profiles, which correspond to the technologies of fluorescence imaging, hyperspectral techniques and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) [ 4 , 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the optical detection techniques, fluorimetry is very attractive since it provides highly selective luminescence evaluation in a tunable emission range. Moreover, the optical chemical sensors based on fluorophores can be combined in sensor arrays and coupled with chemometric approach (Lvova et al, 2014 ), thus permitting the identification and quantitation of various analytes, such as natural water pollutants (Amatori et al, 2012 ; Bazzicalupi et al, 2013 ; Arca et al, 2014 ; Kang et al, 2014 ; Guanais Goncalves et al, 2016 ), toxins (Lvova et al, 2018 ), pesticides (Lei et al, 2016 ), explosives (Bolse et al, 2017 ; Zhu et al, 2017 ), agents hazardous for human skin (Moczko et al, 2016 ), forbidden additives and pathogens in beverages (Tan et al, 2014 ; Nishi et al, 2015 ; Han et al, 2016 ) and in foodstuffs (Lvova et al, 2015 ; Mungkarndee et al, 2015 , 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell-specific biomarkers on gene, protein or metabolite levels can be measured by toxicogenomics, toxicoproteonomics or toxicometabonomics, respectively [6,27,[35][36][37][38][39][40]. The integration of food toxicology data obtained via in vitro biochemical, cell-based, in vivo animal models and in silico systems have led to a mechanistic knowledge of systemic or organ-specific toxicity in humans and the identification and use of specific surrogate biomarkers in clinical settings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%