2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32940-1_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluid Model Checking

Abstract: In this paper we investigate a potential use of fluid approximation techniques in the context of stochastic model checking of CSL formulae. We focus on properties describing the behaviour of a single agent in a (large) population of agents, exploiting a limit result known also as fast simulation. In particular, we will approximate the behaviour of a single agent with a time-inhomogeneous CTMC which depends on the environment and on the other agents only through the solution of the fluid differential equation. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
114
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(117 reference statements)
1
114
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From Table II, we see that the obtained reward converges to a fixed value with increasing model parameter N. Therefore, if one is interested in the value obtained if the model parameters go towards infinity, methods concerned with the limiting behaviour [7,8,40, 1] might be more appropriate. As discussed in the introduction, our method targets at finding conservative bounds for the model under consideration.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Table II, we see that the obtained reward converges to a fixed value with increasing model parameter N. Therefore, if one is interested in the value obtained if the model parameters go towards infinity, methods concerned with the limiting behaviour [7,8,40, 1] might be more appropriate. As discussed in the introduction, our method targets at finding conservative bounds for the model under consideration.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is either an atomic target or a pair of simpler targets combined using the standard logic operators ∧ and ∨. An atomic target f (pv ,sn) is a triple denoting the application of a matching function f to policy values 9 pv from the policy and to policy values from the evaluation context identified by attribute (structured) names 10 sn. In fact, an attribute name refers to a specific attribute of the request or of the environment, which is available via the evaluation context.…”
Section: Policies and Their Syntaxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, one can be interested in modelling also the event of failed delivery of the observers. This is interesting both for producing more realistic models (with unreliable network communication), and for allowing the application of advanced analysis techniques based on fluid approximation [10], such as fluid model-checking [9]. Therefore, we add an error probability to the observers delivery, which we denoted p err (or simply err, in Fig.…”
Section: Stocs: Stochastic Scelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We close this section showing the application of the mean field model-checker FlyFast [19] on the foraging ants example. Fluid model-checking techniques have recently been proposed as scalable techniques for the verification of properties of one (or a few) agents in the context of large populations [4]. These techniques are based on differential semantics, or on difference equations, when considering their discrete time counterparts, as is the case for FlyFast.…”
Section: Mean-field Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%