2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00394-018-1740-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluid intake of children, adolescents and adults in Indonesia: results of the 2016 Liq.In7 national cross-sectional survey

Abstract: PurposeTo report daily total fluid intake (TFI) and fluid types in Indonesia according to age, sex, socio-economic status (SES) and geographic region, and compare TFI with the Indonesian adequate fluid intake (AI) recommendations.MethodsData were collected in 32 cities over nine regions from children (4–9 years, n = 388), adolescents, (10–17 years, n = 478) and adults (18–65 years, n = 2778) using a fluid intake 7-day record (Liq.In7); socio-economic status was also recorded. The 7-day mean TFIs were compared … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
57
0
12

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
57
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Total fluid intake did not differ significantly by sex among adolescents or adults in all of the countries studied, except for adults from Brazil [24, 25, 27, 28]. Given, however, that the AI recommendations for adolescents and adults from EFSA, the IOM, China and Indonesia differ by sex, the data suggest need to explore why beverage volume did not vary by sex.…”
Section: Liqin7 Progress 2015–2018mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Total fluid intake did not differ significantly by sex among adolescents or adults in all of the countries studied, except for adults from Brazil [24, 25, 27, 28]. Given, however, that the AI recommendations for adolescents and adults from EFSA, the IOM, China and Indonesia differ by sex, the data suggest need to explore why beverage volume did not vary by sex.…”
Section: Liqin7 Progress 2015–2018mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…household type, peers)Organizations, champions for drinking waterWater Affordability1EconomicWater price, affordabilityIncome, poverty, income disparity[27][28]Market forcesWater financingWater accessibility2EnvironmentRainfall, droughtWater availability at school/work[29][29][29][29][29][29]Water availability at home, housing quality[29][29][29][29][…”
Section: Liqin7 Progress Relative To What Benchmark?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations