Fluency and Fluency Disorders

Tetnowski, John A.; Scott, Kathy Scaler

doi:10.1002/9781444318975.ch19

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 84 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Disfluency clusters were annotated in each transcription (singletons were not analysed in this study). In disfluency clusters, the following types of disfluencies occurred (based on Roberts, Meltzer, andWilding 2009, andTetnowski andScott 2010): interjections, whole-word repetitions, part-word repetitions, phrase repetitions, prolongations and revisions. Type of interjections can be divided in two subtypes which were counted separately, too: (1) filled pauses which are sounds without meaning (Fletcher, 2010), the most frequent types are ö, m öm, öh in Hungarian (Horváth, 2010) and (2) filler words which are interjections of whole words (Table 2).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clustering of disfluencies in typical, fast and cluttered speech

Bóna

2018

Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cluttering is a fluency disorder which can be characterised by excessive disfluencies. However, the low number of studies dealing with the analysis of disfluencies in cluttering show contradictory results. The aim of this article is to analyse disfluency clusters in cluttered, fast and typical speech. Frequency of all disfluency clusters and those complex disfluencies which contain more than two constituents were analysed. The number and types of the constituents of complex disfluencies and the reason of their occurrence were analysed in detail. Results show that complex disfluencies occurred the most frequently in cluttered speech, and the least frequently in exceptionally rapid speech (ERS). Persons who clutter (PWC) had more and much longer complex disfluencies than typical speakers. Complex disfluencies which suggest difficulties in linguistic formulation occurred in cluttering significantly more times than in typical speech. The results bring us closer to understanding why there are perceptually more disfluencies in cluttered speech than in typical one. In addition, they also seem to strengthen the notion that cluttering is a language disorder.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clustering of disfluencies in typical, fast and cluttered speech

Bóna

2018

Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A meghatározás az opcionális tünetek között említi a) a gyakori "tipikus" megakadásjelenségeket, b) a gyakori artikulációs pontatlanságokat, szótöredékeket, valamint c) az atipikus prozódiai sajátosságokat. Habár a megakadásjelenségek értelmezése és kategorizálása változatos képet mutat hazánkban és a nemzetközi szakirodalomban is (Schriberg 1994;Huszár 2005;Gilquin -De Cook 2013), a definíció a nemzetközi beszédpatológiai gyakorlatban alkalmazott osztályozási rendszerre utal (Tetnowski-Scott 2010). A felosztás tipikus és dadogásszerű megakadásjelenségeket különít el.…”

Section: A Hadarás Nemzetközileg Elfogadott Definíciójaunclassified

Tanulmányok a nyelvészet alkalmazásainak területéről

2022

Beszéd, Kutatás, Alkalmazás

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Clustering of Disfluencies in Informal Conversations of People With Cluttering

Pap

2022

Perspect ASHA SIGs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore the characteristics of disfluency clusters in cluttering in conversation depending on the relationship of communication partners. Method: Ten-minute speech samples of conversations between people with cluttering (PWC) and people who do not clutter (PWNC) were analyzed for disfluencies. For each sample taken, participants were paired with either friends or unknown partners. PWC were also paired with PWNC and with each other. The influence of the different conversational partners on the type and frequency of disfluency was examined. Results: In all conversation samples, PWC exhibited 2.4 times more complex disfluencies than PWNC. In addition, the frequency of complex disfluencies was influenced by the independent variables of PWC/PWNC and relationship of conversational partner. More complex disfluencies were produced by PWC in the conversations with a PWNC friend and with an unknown PWC as compared to conversations with an unknown PWNC and a PWC friend. Conclusions: Results confirm clinical observations that cluttering disfluencies may increase with more familiar conversational partners. However, atypical speech may also increase severity of symptoms. Findings also provide objective information about cluttering in relatively naturalistic situations.

show abstract

Fluency and Fluency Disorders

Cited by 6 publications

References 84 publications

Clustering of disfluencies in typical, fast and cluttered speech

Clustering of disfluencies in typical, fast and cluttered speech

Tanulmányok a nyelvészet alkalmazásainak területéről

Clustering of Disfluencies in Informal Conversations of People With Cluttering

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About