2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flowable composites for restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: Results after five years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
23
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…When the aesthetic is not a concern, glass ionomer should be used, because these restorations revealed the best results in the context of clinical effectiveness 15,27 . However, methacrylate-based composites are usually the first choice to restore these lesions, being the gold-standard, due to their mechanical properties and better esthetic compared to glass ionomers 32 . Microfilled composites demonstrate a greater elasticity than hybrid composites, even presenting excellent polishing properties 16 .…”
Section: A B Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the aesthetic is not a concern, glass ionomer should be used, because these restorations revealed the best results in the context of clinical effectiveness 15,27 . However, methacrylate-based composites are usually the first choice to restore these lesions, being the gold-standard, due to their mechanical properties and better esthetic compared to glass ionomers 32 . Microfilled composites demonstrate a greater elasticity than hybrid composites, even presenting excellent polishing properties 16 .…”
Section: A B Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basically, glass ionomer cements, compomers and composites in various viscosities can be used to restore NCCLs (Cieplik et al, 2017). However, composites are the materials of choice, due to their esthetic and physical properties (Pecie, Krejci, Garcia‐Godoy, & Bortolotto, 2011; Perez et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, only few in‐vivo data on Class V restorations involving composites of different viscosities or comparisons of different preparation designs have been published (Cieplik et al, 2017; Correia et al, 2018; Karaman, Yazici, Ozgunaltay, & Dayangac, 2012; Li, Jepsen, Albers, & Eberhard, 2006; Mullejans et al, 2003; Szesz, Parreiras, Martini, Reis, & Loguercio, 2017). Therefore, the aim of this prospective randomized clinical study was to investigate the influence of dentin surface pretreatment (cleaning vs. roughening vs. groove preparation) and the application of a flowable composite on the clinical long‐term stability of cervical restorations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) are defined as a loss of dental hard tissue at the cemento-enamel junction not related to a carious process (CIEPLIK et al, 2017). They usually result from a multifactorial process associated with abrasive and/or biocorrosive mechanisms but also from occlusal stress when the action of paraaxial occlusal biomechanical loads promote loss of tooth structure (GRIPPO; SIMRING; COLEMAN, 2012;JAKUPOVIC et al, 2014;TEIXEIRA et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%