2019
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2019.933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow modulation by a few fixed spherical particles in a turbulent channel flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the ‘collision-streaming’ algorithm in the standard LBM involves information exchange only among neighbouring lattice nodes, making it highly efficient in large-scale parallel computations (Peng, Ayala & Wang 2019; Fei et al. 2020; Peng, Ayala & Wang 2020; Wang, Fei & Luo 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, the ‘collision-streaming’ algorithm in the standard LBM involves information exchange only among neighbouring lattice nodes, making it highly efficient in large-scale parallel computations (Peng, Ayala & Wang 2019; Fei et al. 2020; Peng, Ayala & Wang 2020; Wang, Fei & Luo 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with PNMs, the LBM is a more accurate pore-scale method since the bounce-back type of boundary schemes in the LBM is very suitable for realistic and complex pore structures (Liu et al 2016;Chen et al 2022), discarding the need for large simplification of real geometries. Finally, the 'collision-streaming' algorithm in the standard LBM involves information exchange only among neighbouring lattice nodes, making it highly efficient in large-scale parallel computations (Peng, Ayala & Wang 2019;Fei et al 2020;Peng, Ayala & Wang 2020;Wang, Fei & Luo 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we focus on sediment-turbulence interactions with relatively low sediment volume fractions as a supplement of those previous studies. As the driving force per unit volume is fixed in all cases, low sediment volume fractions are chosen to avoid introducing too large attenuation to the turbulent kinetic energy, as reported by Peng et al [16].…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, using the interpolated bounce-back (IBB) schemes to treat the noslip boundary condition can easily ensure a second-order accuracy, which has been shown to result in more accurate results in particulate flow simulations than the commonly used diffused-interface immersed boundary method (IBM) [13]. This relatively new approach has been convincingly validated and benchmarked in various particle-laden turbulent flows, such as homogeneous isotropic flows [14], pipe flows [15], and channel flows [16]. In light of these previous studies, we chose the IBB-based LBM as our numerical method to conduct IRDNS to investigate sediment-turbulence interactions in the present study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of different particle-resolved simulation approaches have been developed for particle-laden flows, like the immersed boundary (IB) method (Mittal and Iaccarino, 2005;Uhlmann, 2005;Luo et al, 2007;Breugem, 2012;Kempe and Fröhlich, 2012b;Zhou and Fan, 2014;Tao et al, 2018;Huang and Tian, 2019;Wang et al, 2019) and the distributed Lagrange multiplier (DLM)/fictitious domain approach (Glowinski et al, 1999(Glowinski et al, , 2001Shao, 2007, 2010;Shao et al, 2012;Yu et al, 2021). Particle-resolved simulations have been commonly used to obtain high-fidelity simulation data, which is greatly helpful for developing reduced-order models (Bagchi and Balachandar, 2003;Eaton, 2009;Homann et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2022;Xia et al, 2022;Zhu et al, 2022) or studying the mechanism of the fluid-particle interactions (Uhlmann, 2008;Kidanemariam and Uhlmann, 2014b;Vreman, 2016;Vowinckel et al, 2016;Luo et al, 2017;Peng et al, 2020). The focus of the paper is on a collision algorithm for particles in particle-resolved simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%