2001
DOI: 10.1042/cs1010629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow-mediated dilatation following wrist and upper arm occlusion in humans: the contribution of nitric oxide

Abstract: Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery assessed by high-resolution ultrasound is widely used to measure endothelial function. However, the technique is not standardized, with different groups using occlusion of either the wrist or the upper arm to induce increased blood flow. The validity of the test as a marker of endothelial function rests on the assumption that the dilatation observed is endothelium-dependent and mediated by nitric oxide (NO). We sought to compare the NO component of brachial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
167
4
15

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
12
167
4
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas FMD is predominantly mediated by nitric oxide (NO) (33), the microcirculation is largely independent of NO-mediated regulation and is subject to prostaglandin (34) and nonendotheliumdependent pathways (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas FMD is predominantly mediated by nitric oxide (NO) (33), the microcirculation is largely independent of NO-mediated regulation and is subject to prostaglandin (34) and nonendotheliumdependent pathways (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary outcome variable of the current study was endothelium-dependent, nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation, and we employed the most appropriate FMD methodology on young healthy individuals to suggest a largely NO-mediated response (Doshi et al, 2001;Joannides et al, 1995). Vascular smooth muscle Diurnal Variation in FMD  function (i.e., endothelium-independent vasodilatation) was not measured; however, we are confident that it is not likely to be a significant factor, since previous studies have reported no diurnal variation in endothelium-independent vasodilator function (Gaenzer et al, 2000;Kawano et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to minimise the confounding effects of the vasoactive drugs, we maintained the same medications throughout the baseline and follow-up examination, and thus we believe that it did not affect the validity of our study. Second, the upper arm occlusion method may be confounded by ischaemia of the brachial artery and be less sensitive to endothelial dysfunction than the forearm occlusion method,18 19 although it was also reported that upper arm occlusion elicited a greater percentage change in the diameter of the brachial artery and thus better separated subjects with and without coronary risk factors 20. Third, a recent study demonstrated significant individual variation in the time course of FMD and thus measurement at a single fixed time point may reduce the discriminatory power of FMD testing 21.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%