2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-019-03638-9
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flood hazard assessment and mapping of River Swat using HEC-RAS 2D model and high-resolution 12-m TanDEM-X DEM (WorldDEM)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Before opting for the 2D diffusion wave model, the full momentum model was tested in order to see if results could be improved. Due to modeling errors and unsatisfactory results consisting of large residual water volumes remaining in the lake, at the end of simulations (which did not flow through the breach), the only applied model was the 2D diffusion wave, which is reported to accurately model several use cases, has greater stability and allows the model to run faster [32,56,58,60,61]. Despite providing good stability, there have been reports on instability issues concerning the 2D diffusion wave model [52][53][54].…”
Section: Dam Breach Hydraulic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Before opting for the 2D diffusion wave model, the full momentum model was tested in order to see if results could be improved. Due to modeling errors and unsatisfactory results consisting of large residual water volumes remaining in the lake, at the end of simulations (which did not flow through the breach), the only applied model was the 2D diffusion wave, which is reported to accurately model several use cases, has greater stability and allows the model to run faster [32,56,58,60,61]. Despite providing good stability, there have been reports on instability issues concerning the 2D diffusion wave model [52][53][54].…”
Section: Dam Breach Hydraulic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Horrit and Bates have compared the simulation algorithms of 1D and 2D variants, by applying an error identification methodology for flood simulations in HEC-RAS, LISFLOOD-FP, and TELEMAC software, and have concluded that all models have proven sufficiently accurate, but have different responses when changing the friction parameters. Furthermore, they emphasize the fact that, no matter the quality of the input data, provided the user does not properly fit the data into the appropriate geometrical description of the model, the final results of the simulation will be considerably lower accuracy [31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drainage network results could also be used for the main river channel calculation in the HEC-RAS model, which has the ability to calculate crossed and annular rivers in the plains area [50,51]. This offers the possibility of performing two joint models to improve flood simulation accuracy based on the extracted drainage network and catchments [52].…”
Section: Catchments For Hydrological Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the HEC RAS software was used to estimate river discharge based on GCM-based daily rainfall data, elevation data, land use and land cover data and compares the selected flood models with it to create flood risk maps and it will be very helpful for policymakers in spatial assessment for future risks. As physical modelling is one of the most reliable and accepted methods for studying flood hazard [47]. Several hydrological simulating software and models, such as SWAT, HEC-HMS, and HEC-RAS, were used to understand the flood probability [27,47,48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%