2013
DOI: 10.1111/edt.12068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexural impact force absorption of mouthguard materials using film sensor system

Abstract: The film sensor system was considered to be superior to the load cell system because the maximum stress and stress area could be determined.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9-12 A custom-made MG is considered to be more protective and to offer better wearability than the other types. 15,[17][18][19] Various protocols have already been proposed to evaluate impact performance such as tests on samples, 20,21 on sheets 18,19,[22][23][24] 14 Therefore, all types of MG have to be approved for the highest level of protection for a reasonably foreseeable risk during use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9-12 A custom-made MG is considered to be more protective and to offer better wearability than the other types. 15,[17][18][19] Various protocols have already been proposed to evaluate impact performance such as tests on samples, 20,21 on sheets 18,19,[22][23][24] 14 Therefore, all types of MG have to be approved for the highest level of protection for a reasonably foreseeable risk during use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliability and superiority of such a combined measurement system was already well documented in previous studies 29,30) . Low pressure two-sheet type (LW) and medium pressure mono-sheet type (MS) Prescale films were used to measure peak stress levels ranging from 2.5 to 10 MPa and 10 to 50 MPa respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Numerous studies have investigated the impact absorption properties of mouthguard materials, but these results cannot be directly compared because of differences in experimental systems. As Reza et al found that the load cell system detected changes in overall transmitted impact force more effectively than film sensor systems, we selected the load cell system for the present study 22) . The free-falling ball impact test method used in the present study was adopted from a previous study 20) in order to allow comparison of data for various mouthguard materials (EVA-, polyolefin-and polystyrene-polyolefin copolymer-based sheets).…”
Section: Free-falling Ball Impact Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the MIF-t was 1.15-1.18-fold longer (commercial mouthguard sheets) and 1.03-1.32-fold longer (dental silicone materials) than that of the control group. Reza et al reported that the load absorbance of commercial mouthguard sheets was 24-37% of control MIF 22) . We previously reported that the load absorbance of various commercial mouthguard materials was 26-37% when compared to the control group with regard to MIF, and MIF-t of the commercial mouthguard sheets was 1.26-to 1.59-fold longer than that of the control group 20) .…”
Section: Free-falling Ball Impact Testmentioning
confidence: 99%