2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-022-04571-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexo printability of agro and invasive papers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prints made with magenta and cyan inks were found to have higher values for graininess (the magenta prints were between 0.14 and 0.20 and the cyan prints were between 0.12 and 0.18) and for mottling (the magenta prints were between 0.12 and 0.13 and the cyan prints were between 0.11 and 0.17) compared to prints made with other inks (whose values for graininess of yellow prints ranged from 0.05 to 0.08 and for black prints from 0.06 to 0.09, while mottling values for yellow prints ranged from 0.06 to 0.09 and for black prints from 0.06 to 0.09). As stated in the research by Karlovits et al [39], different surface free energies and different values of ink penetration depth do not directly affect the uneven ink coverage on the substrate when printing is conducted with low-viscosity ink. Both analyzed values of uneven ink coverage on the printing substrate presented in Figure 9a,b were increased by up to 0.20 for gravure prints compared to offset prints (by up to 0.11) indicating that a greater depth of ink penetration into the printing substrate results in greater uneven surface coverage with ink.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Prints made with magenta and cyan inks were found to have higher values for graininess (the magenta prints were between 0.14 and 0.20 and the cyan prints were between 0.12 and 0.18) and for mottling (the magenta prints were between 0.12 and 0.13 and the cyan prints were between 0.11 and 0.17) compared to prints made with other inks (whose values for graininess of yellow prints ranged from 0.05 to 0.08 and for black prints from 0.06 to 0.09, while mottling values for yellow prints ranged from 0.06 to 0.09 and for black prints from 0.06 to 0.09). As stated in the research by Karlovits et al [39], different surface free energies and different values of ink penetration depth do not directly affect the uneven ink coverage on the substrate when printing is conducted with low-viscosity ink. Both analyzed values of uneven ink coverage on the printing substrate presented in Figure 9a,b were increased by up to 0.20 for gravure prints compared to offset prints (by up to 0.11) indicating that a greater depth of ink penetration into the printing substrate results in greater uneven surface coverage with ink.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Invasive waste can also be used to produce bioenergy, namely bioethanol, biogas, or wood fuel (e.g., [133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140][141][142][143][144][145][146][147][148]), biochar or charcoal for different purposes (e.g., [149][150][151][152][153]), or animal feed (e.g., [154][155][156][157]. Some authors also suggest the use of IAPs for effluent treatments (e.g., [158][159][160][161][162][163][164][165]), paper and packaging materials (e.g., [166][167][168][169][170]), building materials [171], natural fiber composites [172], and bio-adsorbents for textile dyes or others [173][174][175][176][177][178][179]…”
Section: Potential Applications Of Iap Waste From Management Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its quick replenishment and spreading can be made useful if appropriate utilization can be organized, and recently alternative papers made from invasive plants have been found to be good materials for packaging [9,10] as well as for printing [11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%