2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01584.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling

Abstract: Species distribution modelling is central to both fundamental and applied research in biogeography. Despite widespread use of models, there are still important conceptual ambiguities as well as biotic and algorithmic uncertainties that need to be investigated in order to increase confidence in model results. We identify and discuss five areas of enquiry that are of high importance for species distribution modelling: (1) clarification of the niche concept; (2) improved designs for sampling data for building mod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
1,274
0
39

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,511 publications
(1,320 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
7
1,274
0
39
Order By: Relevance
“…Ecologic niches can be estimated by integrating information on spatial occurrences of the species with relevant raster data layers summarizing aspects of the environment (Araú jo and Guisan, 2006). Once developed, niche models can be used to identify suitable areas for populations of the species, effectively creating potential distribution maps (Austin et al, 1990;Peterson, 2003).…”
Section: Ecologic Niche Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecologic niches can be estimated by integrating information on spatial occurrences of the species with relevant raster data layers summarizing aspects of the environment (Araú jo and Guisan, 2006). Once developed, niche models can be used to identify suitable areas for populations of the species, effectively creating potential distribution maps (Austin et al, 1990;Peterson, 2003).…”
Section: Ecologic Niche Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gathering of the environmental data with the highest predictive potential, supported by prior knowledge about the prevailing factors in the studied species distribution, is foreseen as one of the major steps to be taken in species distribution modelling (Araújo and Guisan, 2006). In this sense it is crucial to make an appropriate review of existing knowledge concerning the ecological factors considered influential in the distribution of a species as this allows a better and safer choice of the independent variables eligible for integrating the predictive statistic models.…”
Section: Environmental Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…atroparvus, it was necessary to evaluate their predictive performances. Since it is only possible to evaluate the appropriateness of the results for the intended purpose after this procedure has been carried out, it is considered a fundamental stage in species distribution modelling (Araújo and Guisan, 2006). In the context of the present work, the results evaluation also allowed us to differentiate the performances obtained by each of the modelling methods.…”
Section: Calibration Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The area under the curve (AUC) measures the ability of the model to classify correctly a species as present or absent. A rough guide for classifying the model accuracy is: 0·50 -0·60 = insufficient; 0·60 -0·70 = poor; 0·70 -0·80 = average; 0·80 -0·90 = good; 0·90 -1 = excellent (Araujo & Guisan 2006) …”
Section: Model Selection and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%