2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Five-axis additive manufacturing of freeform models through buildup of transition layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The scope of 3D printing is still limited and confined to some extent. As the technological advancement occurs, we are looking for better opportunities to gain full optimization of 3D technology [ 63 , 64 ].…”
Section: Discussion and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scope of 3D printing is still limited and confined to some extent. As the technological advancement occurs, we are looking for better opportunities to gain full optimization of 3D technology [ 63 , 64 ].…”
Section: Discussion and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, employing an industrial robot is advantageous, where the link and joint motions are already programmed. There are several commercial multi-axis Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM) packages for conventional machining, but there is a lack of such for FDM printing (Isa & Lazoglu, 2019). However, sequentially FDM printed parts in discrete build orientations can be re-alized using conventional slicers.…”
Section: Robot-based Fdmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coordinate points on the tangent plane of the model are obtained by the skeleton curve equation and the bottom curve equation. (5) The nozzle direction corresponding to the coordinate point of the model is not along the Z-axis, so the current nozzle direction should be rotated to the direction of the actual printing, and the coordinate point corresponding to the nozzle rotation is the coordinate point of the actual printing. (6) Obtain the actual printed coordinate points and the rotation angle corresponding to the platform, and output G-code.…”
Section: The Path Planning Algorithm Flow For Axial Printingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jin et al [4] proposed a slicing procedure and corresponding algorithms to determine the extruder path for a theoretical 3-axis machine; their approach could preserve tiny features on the surface by increasing the number of 2 of 19 sampling points around small features, and a B-spline was used to approximate the curved surfaces accurately; however, no real parts were manufactured in their study. By rechecking the path and tool orientation conditions, Isa et al [5] proposed a 5-axis path planning method that considers the contour of a freeform surface to prevent the effect of the staircase effects on hollow and solid components. Ding et al [6] proposed a method based on the medial axis transformation path, planning to generate deposition paths for wire and arc additive manufacturing, which can improve the quality and material efficiency of thin-walled structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%