2017
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fisheries productivity under progressive coral reef degradation

Abstract: In response to multiple stressors, coral reef health has declined in recent decades, with reefs exhibiting reduced living coral and structural complexity, and a concomitant rise in the dominance of algal resources. Reef degradation alters food availability and reduces the diversity and density of refuges for prey. These changes affect predator–prey interactions and can have cascading impacts on food webs and fisheries productivity. We use a size‐based ecosystem model of coral reefs that incorporates the influe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
130
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
130
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, a number of herbivorous fishes such as Leptoscarus vaigiensis , Siganus sutor and Naso unicornis have evolved to target the high net primary production of canopy‐forming macroalgae (Choat, Robbins, & Clements, ; Hoey, Brandl, & Bellwood, ; Lim et al, ). These browsing herbivores may exhibit some of the highest known rates of secondary production (i.e., somatic growth) in tropical reef fishes (Morais & Bellwood, ), which can underpin important tropical fisheries (Hicks & McClanahan, ; Robinson et al, ; Rogers, Blanchard, & Mumby, ). We note emerging evidence that suggests microalgae, endolithic algae and bacteria are targeted by some reef fishes (Clements et al, 2017), which further quantitative data may ultimately reveal as a highly productive resource alongside macroscopic autotrophs such as macroalgae and corals.…”
Section: Ecosystem Functions and Services From Macroalgal Reefsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a number of herbivorous fishes such as Leptoscarus vaigiensis , Siganus sutor and Naso unicornis have evolved to target the high net primary production of canopy‐forming macroalgae (Choat, Robbins, & Clements, ; Hoey, Brandl, & Bellwood, ; Lim et al, ). These browsing herbivores may exhibit some of the highest known rates of secondary production (i.e., somatic growth) in tropical reef fishes (Morais & Bellwood, ), which can underpin important tropical fisheries (Hicks & McClanahan, ; Robinson et al, ; Rogers, Blanchard, & Mumby, ). We note emerging evidence that suggests microalgae, endolithic algae and bacteria are targeted by some reef fishes (Clements et al, 2017), which further quantitative data may ultimately reveal as a highly productive resource alongside macroscopic autotrophs such as macroalgae and corals.…”
Section: Ecosystem Functions and Services From Macroalgal Reefsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, declines in the structural complexity of reef habitat are often linked to changes in fish communities, with likely impacts on fishery services (Pratchett, Hoey, & Wilson, 2014). However, recent modelling and empirical research suggests that increases in herbivorous fish are able to maintain fishery yields under certain conditions (Robinson et al, 2019;Rogers, Blanchard, Mumby, & Arlinghaus, 2018). The links between ecological change and services may therefore be more complex than originally suggested (Daw et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reef degradation and its associated loss of complexity may also eventually affect these lobsters in other ways by decreasing available refuge or reproduction sites (Wynne and Côté, 2007;Lozano-Álvarez et al, 2017). Precisely because of these issues, productivity of reef fisheries is expected to decline with increasing coral reef degradation (Rogers et al, 2018). However, this might not necessarily be the case for P. argus given the greater movement ranges and colonization abilities of this species that allow it to use various habitats in addition to coral reefs Briones-Fourzán, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%