1996
DOI: 10.1016/0165-7836(95)00459-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fish predation on neritic ctenophores from the Argentine continental shelf: A neglected food resource?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
47
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The dominance of T. kerguelensis in the diet suggested that B. macloviana fed deep in the substrate. On the other hand, Mianzan et al (1996) found that this species may also feed on ctenophores, a feeding behaviour that can be explained by the later finding of nearbottom aggregations of these planktonic organisms (Costello and Mianzan, 2003;Colombo et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dominance of T. kerguelensis in the diet suggested that B. macloviana fed deep in the substrate. On the other hand, Mianzan et al (1996) found that this species may also feed on ctenophores, a feeding behaviour that can be explained by the later finding of nearbottom aggregations of these planktonic organisms (Costello and Mianzan, 2003;Colombo et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Baltic pelagic food webs, predation on a combination of heterotrophic and autotrophic microplankton by M. ovum could potentially imply competitive interactions with herbivorous crustaceans. On the other hand, similar to ctenophores in other regions (Mianzan et al 1996), M. ovum could serve as a prey for zooplanktivores, such as mysids, herring, and sprat-a prey that has never been accounted for in food web models. The assessment of M. ovum's ecological significance in the Baltic Sea requires coherent experimental and field studies as well as data on its distribution and population dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In aquatic communities, body shape and size and mouth position has been related directly to foraging success (KARPOUZI & STERGIOU 2003). These similarities could be the reason why they have adapted to explore different bay zones, with the abundant M. furnieri being more adapted to cope with harsh condi- NARANJO (1956), (5) MIANZAN et al (1996), (6) SIERRA et al (1994), (7) Austin & AUSTIN (1971), (8) VAZZOLER (1971), (9) FIGUEIREDO & VIEIRA (1998); (10) CHAO (1978), (11) CERVIGÓN (1993), (12) CERVIGÓN et al (1992), (13) BOWMAN et al (2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%