1975
DOI: 10.2307/1935317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fish Predation on Bosmina longirostris: Body-Size Selection Versus Visibility Selection

Abstract: We examine the effects of fish predation on a population of Bosmina longirostris (O. F. Muller), a smaller, limnetic cladoceran, in Gatun Lake, Panama. We test the relative importance of two different modes of predator selection: body—size selection, in which fish choose the largest of otherwise identically appearing individuals, and visibility selection, in which fish choose individuals having the greatest amount of body pigmentation. In B. longirostris, this pigmentation is most heavily concentrated in the l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

10
165
0
7

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 291 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
10
165
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore not surprisingly, prey visibility (Zaret & Kerfoot 1975) or apparent size (O'Brien et al 1976) determines fish selection more significantly than actual prey size (Brooks & Dodson 1965). Moreover, recent experiments with virtual plankton images (Brewer & Coughlin 1996) show that fish select accordingly to the moving pattern of the prey and so prey motion can increase prey conspicuousness to fish predators as has been suggested by Zaret (1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Therefore not surprisingly, prey visibility (Zaret & Kerfoot 1975) or apparent size (O'Brien et al 1976) determines fish selection more significantly than actual prey size (Brooks & Dodson 1965). Moreover, recent experiments with virtual plankton images (Brewer & Coughlin 1996) show that fish select accordingly to the moving pattern of the prey and so prey motion can increase prey conspicuousness to fish predators as has been suggested by Zaret (1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Zaret and Suffern (1976) explained vertical migration as a mechanism of zooplankton to avoid predation, which is related to luminosity, body size and visibility of the prey. These factors cause predators like planktivorous fish to prey differently on the Cladocera community (Zaret, 1972;Zaret and Kerfoot, 1975). Later, Lampert (1989) pointed to light-related mortality as the ultimate reason for the vertical movements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…highly pigmented) ones. This visibility selection of fish may also cause changes in their prey communities (Zaret, 1972;Zaret and Kerfoot, 1975). For studies on past fish stocks, Jeppesen et al (1996) created the first quantitative paleolimnological reconstruction model using the relationship between cladoceran remains and planktivorous fish.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%