2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2019.106331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fish functional groups in the San Francisco Estuary: Understanding new fish assemblages in a highly altered estuarine ecosystem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of this study are also expected to pave the way to similar screening applications to other highly urbanised estuarine ecosystems worldwide (e.g. Aguilar-Medrano et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The findings of this study are also expected to pave the way to similar screening applications to other highly urbanised estuarine ecosystems worldwide (e.g. Aguilar-Medrano et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…However, a number of other aspects of the organism's function were also linked to its morphology, such as diet and reproduction, and therefore could also interact with the evolution of locomotor capacities (Collar et al, 2008). Because the phenotypic and trophic variation of the species has been used to lay the basis to determine their functional relationships (Aguilar-Medrano et al, 2019;Braga et al, 2012;Fabre et al, 2016;Lobato et al, 2014;Losos, 2009;Price et al, 2010), in the present study, the morphological variation of the disc and feeding structures, as well as trophic data of 9 species of Bathomorphi were analyzed and phylogenetic comparative methods were used to determine whether the morphological variation is related to the trophic ecology of the group. Finally, because the locomotor system in fish is conditioned by factors linked to the ecological mechanisms and responsible for their evolution, we expected that disc shape would be phylogenetically related to feeding structures (Meckel's cartilage -MC from now on-, and teeth) of the species here analyzed (Langerhans & Reznick, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…South Asia, Europe, and North America) are used for controlling floods, limiting saltwater intrusion, abating coastal erosion, providing irrigation water, growing desirable vegetation and fishes, and enhancing waterfowl and wading‐bird habitat (Kaminski & Prince 1981; Bamber et al 1991; Rogers et al 1994; de Graaf & Marttin 2003; Frisch et al 2006). Many managed wetlands are novel environments that exhibit diverse geomorphic and water‐quality conditions, which then support a distinctive suite of native and non‐native species (Hobbs et al 2006; Aguilar‐Medrano et al 2019). For example, managed wetlands can have lower densities of large migratory fish species, but higher densities of small resident fishes, than tidal wetlands (Rozas & Minello 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most managed landscapes are wetlands focused on waterfowl habitat that are seasonally flooded and exhibit muted tidal exchange. These managed wetlands are novel ecosystems supporting a mixture of native and non‐native aquatic species (Moyle et al 2014; Aguilar‐Medrano et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%