2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2020.110111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fish freshness monitoring using UV-fluorescence imaging on Japanese dace (Tribolodon hakonensis) fisheye

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Omwange et al. (2020) used EEM in combination with PLSR to select excitation wavelengths for developing LED‐IF imaging systems for fish freshness estimation (using K ‐value). Three main peaks, denoted A, B, and C, with excitation wavelengths of 230, 290, and 350 nm, respectively, were observed in the EEM of the fish eyeball.…”
Section: Analysis Related To Lif and Led‐if Techniques At Laboratory ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Omwange et al. (2020) used EEM in combination with PLSR to select excitation wavelengths for developing LED‐IF imaging systems for fish freshness estimation (using K ‐value). Three main peaks, denoted A, B, and C, with excitation wavelengths of 230, 290, and 350 nm, respectively, were observed in the EEM of the fish eyeball.…”
Section: Analysis Related To Lif and Led‐if Techniques At Laboratory ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides red snapper, the fluorescence properties of Japanese dace (Tribolodon hakonensis) has also been investigated. Omwange et al [ 46 ] developed a K value “standard freshness index” prediction model by extracting color components from the fluorescent images of the pupil and iris, and achieved good results with an RMSECV of 3.5% and R 2 of 0.92. When studying mackerel (Trachurus japonicus), Rahman et al [ 48 ] used three-dimensional fluorescence fingerprints (3D-FFs) to characterize the fluorophores in the fish.…”
Section: Quality Evaluation Of White Meatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficient of determination assessed the performance of these models for predicting K value and FFA for test sets, 𝑅 (equation ( 4)), root mean square error of test 𝑅𝑀𝑆𝐸 (equation ( 5)) (Omwange et al, 2020), and residual prediction deviation for tests (𝑅𝑃𝐷 ) (Forouzangohar et al, 2008). An RPD value lower than 2.0 will give irrelevant prediction results, whereas any value between 2.0-3.0 is considered satisfactory for rough screening.…”
Section: .Fluorescence Measurement (Excitation-emission Matrix)mentioning
confidence: 99%