2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2018.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fish distributions in a tidal channel indicate the behavioural impact of a marine renewable energy installation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the seasonal variation observed, caution should be given to extrapolating any results beyond the sampled time period. Fish have been shown to potentially modify their behaviour in the presence of marine renewable devices in other development areas (Fraser et al, ; Viehman & Zydlewski, ), and so work is currently underway to understand how schools may react to an operating tidal kite.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the seasonal variation observed, caution should be given to extrapolating any results beyond the sampled time period. Fish have been shown to potentially modify their behaviour in the presence of marine renewable devices in other development areas (Fraser et al, ; Viehman & Zydlewski, ), and so work is currently underway to understand how schools may react to an operating tidal kite.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new aspect of tidal marine renewable energy (MRE) devices is that they have parts, or the entire structure itself, which move through the water and at speeds up to an order of magnitude greater than the prevailing currents. This presents a need to understand the potential spatial and temporal overlap between marine fauna, such as fish (Fraser, Williamson, Nikora, & Scott, ; Viehman & Zydlewski, ) and top predators such as diving seabirds and marine mammals (Williamson et al, ), and mobile MRE devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The early stages of this industry and the difficulty of surveying fishes in these energetic environments necessitate empirical data. While there have been several peer-reviewed field studies in recent years that have decreased uncertainty in this area [11][12][13][14][15][16][17], many questions remain. Best practices for monitoring and detecting device effects, at the individual or array level, remain under development [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The near-field evasion zone (0-5 m or <2 turbine diameters from a device, mesoscale) and mid-field avoidance zone (5-100 m or >2 turbine diameters from a device, macroscale) have been proposed as the most important for assessing fish interactions with a single device [4,19]. Near-field observations have been few to date [11,13,[15][16][17] and reflect the difficulty of observation near an operating device. Mid-field effects of a deployed device on fish, if any, could involve behavior changes related to general avoidance associated with optimizing swimming speed while minimizing energetic costs [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation