Fiscal Policy and Growth in Developing Asia

Abstract

In this paper we empirically explore the relationship between fiscal policy and economic growth in developing Asia. The region's overall level of taxes and government spending are substantially lower than those prevailing in advanced economies. Nevertheless, there are conceptual grounds why fiscal policy, including the composition of taxes and government spending, can have a significant effect on growth, as our empirical analysis shows. In line with economic theory, property taxes have a more benign impact on growth than direct taxes, and spending more on education has a sizable positive impact on growth. The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent.ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use.By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term "country" in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Note: In this publication, "$" refers to US dollars.The ADB Economics Working Paper Series is a forum for stimulating discussion and eliciting feedback on ongoing and recently completed research and policy studies undertaken by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) staff, consultants, or resource persons. The series deals with key economic and development problems, particularly those facing the Asia and Pacific region; as well as conceptual, analytical, or methodological issues relating to project/program economic analysis, and statistical data and measurement. The series aims to enhance the knowledge on Asia's development and policy challenges; strengthen analytical rigor and quality of ADB's country partnership strategies, and its subregional and country operations; and improve the quality and availability of statistical data and development indicators for monitoring development effectiveness.

The Relation of Fiscal Decentralization, Regional Finance and Social Justice for the Local Development of Indonesia

“…Besides that regional financial allocations for spending on goods, services and capital spending can be directed at meeting the needs of life and the creation of jobs is increasingly widespread in various regions. In this case based on the results of research by Abdon, et al (2014) showed that that the composition of government spending also has a significant effect on economic growth. More specifically, our analysis indicates that shifting public spending to education will yield a sizable dividend growth.…”

Empirical Investigation of the Influence of Fiscal Policy on Sri Lankas Economic Growth from 1990 to 2019

“…A 1 percent increase in total expenditure decreases the GDP growth by 73 percent at 5% level. Baum andKoester (2011) and also retained these findings but, A Baum and Koester (2011); Oo (2019); Gechert (2015); Muravska, Martyniuk, Dluhopolskyi, Kniaz, and Podolchak (2020) and Abdon (2014) have found there is a positive linkage between the total expenditure or government expenditure and the economic growth. Similarly, the trade openness has negatively and significantly connected with GDP growth.…”

“…The result reveals 9 percent of GDP boost due to 1 percent increase in tax revenue. Baum and Koester (2011); Muravska et al (2020) and Abdon (2014) also have investigated a positive significant relationship between tax revenue and he economic growth. The short-run coefficient of Trade openness indicates that Trade openness has a significant and positive effect on a 1 percent increase in Trade openness enhances GDP growth by 18 percent in lag 2.…”

Fiscal Policy for Inclusive Growth: An Overview

“…A comparison of the trends during the 1990s and 2000s indicates that the region has trailed other parts of the world in tax revenues, as they are less than half those of the OECD, as is graphically illustrated in Abdon et al (2014). The gap between developing Asia and the OECD may be explained in part by the tendency for tax revenues to rise with per capita income, but developing Asia also lags Latin America-a region with comparable income and development-in both tax and non-tax revenues (see Das-Gupta 2014 Taxes are the primary sources of fiscal revenues.…”

“…Among the large Asian economies in Figure 14 While taxes in general tend to deter growth, there are certain types of taxes that are considered less detrimental than others. Abdon et al (2014) simulate the impact on growth of altering the tax composition and find that reducing the reliance on income tax while raising the use of consumption and other taxes can raise GDP growth over the long run. Another finding is that raising property taxes while reducing income tax can be more beneficial to growth.…”