Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The more comprehensive the US examination, the more sensitive it is in detecting change 51. However, reduced-joint US assessments have also shown a good sensitivity,47 48 55 60 61 focusing either on a few target joints such as the wrist, metacarpophalangeal and metatarsophalangeal joints or on a few small joints plus one or two large joints 47 48 55 60 62…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more comprehensive the US examination, the more sensitive it is in detecting change 51. However, reduced-joint US assessments have also shown a good sensitivity,47 48 55 60 61 focusing either on a few target joints such as the wrist, metacarpophalangeal and metatarsophalangeal joints or on a few small joints plus one or two large joints 47 48 55 60 62…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a data-driven approach, the same group of authors set out to validate a new MSUS score in a large survey of early or established RA. The set comprising GS/pD scores of seven joints/two tendons (first and second MCP, second MCP, third PIP, radiocarpal, elbow, first and second MTP, tibialis posterior tendon, extensor carpi ulnaris tendon) preserved most of the information when compared to a 9-joint score (which added fifth MCP and fifth MTP) [100].…”
Section: Ultrasound Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these analyses, we identified groups with correlating scores to guide the selection of the final US joint set. In groups with more than one joint identified by factor analysis, the selection process was based on factor loading and previous work to identify joints that retained most information from the extensive score 6. The final US score was defined as the sum of the joint/tendon scores in the final joint set.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our research group recently developed two candidate sets of reduced US joint inflammation scores in early RA through a data-driven approach in cross-sectional data, aiming to retain as much information as possible from the full score 6. The candidate scores performed well in a validation cohort of established RA, and performed better than previously proposed reduced joint scores 3–5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%