2006
DOI: 10.1086/499093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First Measurement of the Clustering Evolution of Photometrically Classified Quasars

Abstract: We present new measurements of the quasar angular autocorrelation function from a sample of $80,000 photometrically classified quasars taken from the First Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. We find a best-fit model of !() ¼ (0:066 þ0:026 À0:024 ) À ( 0:98AE0:15 ) for the angular correlation function, consistent with estimates of the slope from spectroscopic quasar surveys. We show that only models with little or no evolution in the clustering of quasars in comoving coordinates since a median redshi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

37
273
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(312 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(76 reference statements)
37
273
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 39: Auto-correlation length r 0 of DSFGs compared to a variety of galaxy populations over the redshift interval 0 < z < 3. These include optically-selected SDSS QSOs at 0 < z < 3 (Myers et al, 2006;Ross et al, 2009) Lyman-break galaxies (Adelberger et al, 2005), MIPS 24 µm-selected star-forming galaxies at 0 < z < 1.4 , AGES and DEEP2 red and blue galaxies at 0.25 < z < 1 from the AGES (Hickox et al, 2009;Coil et al, 2008) SDSS-selected luminous red galaxies (LRGs) at 0 < z < 0.7 (Wake et al, 2008), and optically-selected galaxy clusters at 0.1 < z < 0.3 (Estrada et al, 2009). The figure also shows the r 0 for low-redshift galaxies with r-band luminosities in the range 1.5 to 3.5 L , derived from the luminosity dependence of clustering (Zehavi et al, 2011).…”
Section: Clustering Of Dsfgsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 39: Auto-correlation length r 0 of DSFGs compared to a variety of galaxy populations over the redshift interval 0 < z < 3. These include optically-selected SDSS QSOs at 0 < z < 3 (Myers et al, 2006;Ross et al, 2009) Lyman-break galaxies (Adelberger et al, 2005), MIPS 24 µm-selected star-forming galaxies at 0 < z < 1.4 , AGES and DEEP2 red and blue galaxies at 0.25 < z < 1 from the AGES (Hickox et al, 2009;Coil et al, 2008) SDSS-selected luminous red galaxies (LRGs) at 0 < z < 0.7 (Wake et al, 2008), and optically-selected galaxy clusters at 0.1 < z < 0.3 (Estrada et al, 2009). The figure also shows the r 0 for low-redshift galaxies with r-band luminosities in the range 1.5 to 3.5 L , derived from the luminosity dependence of clustering (Zehavi et al, 2011).…”
Section: Clustering Of Dsfgsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An appropriate random catalogue will mimic the angular and redshift distribution of the data, in the absence of any clustering. Since our KDE-complete sample of binary quasars is drawn from the KDE catalogue described in §2, the random catalogue needs to have the same overall angular and redshift coverage as the KDE catalogue (see, e.g., Myers et al 2006Myers et al , 2007a. The entire volume of the KDE catalogue comprises ∼ 41.93 (h −1 Gpc ) 3 .…”
Section: Estimating the Small-scale Clustering Of Quasarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(This measurement is, however, limited to the bias of resolved blazars, which can be different from the bias of unresolved blazars which contribute to the CGB anisotropy.) At the moment, one may estimate b B L; z from several approaches including the angular and spatial correlation analysis of optical quasars [51,52] …”
Section: A Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%