1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)80023-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finnish national register of laparoscopic hysterectomies: A review and complications of 1165 operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
60
3
8

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
9
60
3
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The main reasons for hysterectomy in Finland are uterine fibroids and menorrhagia. 34 As we had 1,596 total hysterectomies compared to that of 86 subtotal ones (of which 89 and 1 among the hrHPV positives, respectively), we do not have enough power to evaluate if there are statistically significant differences between these 2 methods and risk of the hrHPV infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reasons for hysterectomy in Finland are uterine fibroids and menorrhagia. 34 As we had 1,596 total hysterectomies compared to that of 86 subtotal ones (of which 89 and 1 among the hrHPV positives, respectively), we do not have enough power to evaluate if there are statistically significant differences between these 2 methods and risk of the hrHPV infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7,[29][30][31][32][33] No urinary tract damage was observed in the VH group; however, in the 2D TLH group, two patients reported ureter injury and one patient revealed vesicovaginal fistula; in the 3D TLH group, ureter injury developed in one patient in our study. We found urinary injury ratios for 2D and 3D TLH groups (2.9% and 2.4%, respectively) to be higher than the 0.2%-0.4% values for TLH as mentioned in other studies; [34,35] however, we did not observe any significant difference between the 2D and 3D TLH groups in terms of the urinary injury rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Повреждение сосудов во время лапароскопических операций, к счастью, встречается редко. Результаты исследований, про-веденных в отдельных странах, показали, что часто-та составляет 0,1 случая на тысячу процедур [23,24]. Это ниже, чем частота повреждений других органов (кишечника, уретры или мочевого пузыря) [25][26][27].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified