2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.98.035107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-temperature properties of the extended Heisenberg model on a triangular lattice

Abstract: We present numerical results for the J1-J2 Heisenberg model on a triangular lattice at finite temperatures T > 0. In contrast to unfrustrated lattices we reach much lower T ∼ 0.15J1. In static quantities the novel feature is a quite sharp low-T maximum in the specific heat. Dynamical spin structure factor S(q, ω) allows for the extraction of the effective spin-wave energies ωq(T ) and their damping γq(T ). While for J2 = 0 our results are consistent with T = 0 spin ordering, J2/J1 ∼ 0.1 induces additional frus… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results, presented in Fig. 5, are qualitatively consistent with previous ones for N = 30 [24] but due to larger size and consequently smaller T f s more clearly reveal the small entropy s(T ) and related diverging R(T ) below T ∼ 0.2 for J 2 ∼ 0, where the g.s. possesses magnetic LRO.…”
Section: B J1-j2 Heisenberg Model On Triangular Latticesupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Results, presented in Fig. 5, are qualitatively consistent with previous ones for N = 30 [24] but due to larger size and consequently smaller T f s more clearly reveal the small entropy s(T ) and related diverging R(T ) below T ∼ 0.2 for J 2 ∼ 0, where the g.s. possesses magnetic LRO.…”
Section: B J1-j2 Heisenberg Model On Triangular Latticesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In any case, due to frustration and consequently enhanced s(T J 1 ) in SL models FTLM generally allows to reach lower effective T f s . E.g., while for HM on a (unfrustrated) SQL (even at largest N = 36) T f s ∼ 0.4J 1 [62,63], SL models allow for considerably lower T f s ≤ 0.1 [24,56]. b) For systems with only short-range spin correlations one can reach situation where spin correlation length (even at T → 0) is shorter that the system length, ξ ≤ L. In such a case, FTLM has no obvious restrictions even at T → 0, so T f s ∼ 0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Figs. 1a,b we present s(T ) and χ 0 (T ), respectively, as obtained on TL for J 2 = 0.1 on N = 30 via FTLM on EM and SEM, compared with the full HM on the same size [54]. The qualitative behavior of both quantities within EM and SEM is quite similar at low T < 0.4, although EM (SEM) miss (as expected) s(T ) with increasing T , but apparently also some part of spin fluctuations reducing the value of χ 0 (T ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%